Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2 Optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 123-129

  Yoshiura, Kazunori ^a   Kawazu, Toshiyuki ^a   Chikui, Tohru ^a   Tatsumi, Masato ^a   Tokumori, Kenji ^a   Tanaka, Takemasa ^a   Kanda, Shigenobu ^a  

^a Graduate School of Medical Sciences   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION DOSE; STANDARD; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

CONTRAST MEDIA; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0032610558     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70305-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Furkart AJ, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Nummikoski P, Matteson S. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:652-60.
2. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994;28:363-7.
3. Reichl P, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Goldsmith LJ. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands. Angle Orthod 1996;66:65-72.
4. Svanæs DB, Møystad A, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:94-100.
5. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:344-50.
6. Møystad A, Svanæs DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system: a comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1996;25:202-6.
7. Svenson B, Welander U. Anneroth G, Soderfeldt B. Exposure parameters and their effects on diagnostic accuracy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:544-50.
8. Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Chikui T, et al. Assessment of image quality in dental radiograpy, part 1: phantom validity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:115-22.
9. Loo L-ND, Doi K, Ishida M, et al. An empirical investigation of variability in contrast-detail diagram measurements. Proc SPIE 1983;419:68-76.
10. Kundel HL. Visual perception and image display terminals. Radiol Clin North Am 1986;24:69-78.
11. Rose A. The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. J Opt Soc Am 1948;38:196-208.
12. Hemminger BM. Johnston E, Rolland JP, Muller KE. Introduction to perceptual linearlization of video display systems for medical image presentation. J Digit Imaging 1995;8:21-34.
13. Brettle DS, Workman A, Ellwood RP, Launders JH, Horner K, Davies RM. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography. Br J Radiol 1996;69:256-61.
14. Nielsen LL, Hoemoe M, Wenzel A. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 1996;6:167-72.