Standardized visual evoked potentials for telematic electrodiagnosis from five laboratories in three European countries

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 23-31

  Papakostopoulos, D ^a   Dean Hart, J C ^a   Papakostopoulos, S ^a   Dodson, K ^a   Williams, A ^a  

^a BRISTOL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; TELEMEDICINE; TELEMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; EYE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TELEMEDICINE; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0032609769     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/1357633991932351     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Papakostopoulos D. Clinical electrophysiology of the human visual system. In: Chiarenza GA, Papakostopoulos D, eds. Clinical Applications of Cerebral Evoked Potentials in Paediatric Medicine. Amsterdam: Exerpta Medica, 1982: 3-40
2. Dean Hart JC, Papakostopoulos D. Electrodiagnostic evaluation of the visual system: the role of the clinician. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1994;16:121-9
3. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1972;i:982-5
4. Apkarian P. Electrodiagnosis in paediatric ophthalmogenetics. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1994;16:229-43
5. Halliday AM, ed. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1982
6. Regan D. Human Electrophysiology. London: Elsevier, 1989
7. Harding GFA. Technical issues in visual evoked cortical potential recording. In Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. St Louis: Mosely Year Book, 1991: 435-41
8. Cant BR, Hume AL, Shaw NA. Effects of luminance on the pattern evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1978;45:496-504
9. Wright MJ, Johnson A. The effects of contrast and length of gratings on the visual evoked potential. Vision Research 1982;22:389-99
10. Paulos WM, Hömberg V, Cunningham K, Halliday AM, Rohde N. Color and luminance components of foveal visual evoked responses in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1984;58:107-19
11. Parker DM, Salzen EA. The spatial selectivity of early and late waves within the human visual evoked response. Perception 1977;5:85-95
12. Prevec FH. The neurophysiological significance of the N1 and P1 components of the visual evoked potential. Clinical Vision Sciences 1987;3:195-202
13. Bodis-Wollner I, Brannan JR, Nicoll J, Frkovic S, Mylin LH. A short latency cortical component of the foveal VEP is revealed by hemifield stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1992;84:201-8
14. Kriss A, Halliday AM. A comparison of occipital potential evoked by pattern onset, offset and reversal by movement. In: Barber C, ed. Evoked Potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1980: 205-12
15. Yamazaki H, Munakata S. Accommodation power determined with visual evoked potentials in psychogenic visual disturbances. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1995;90:271-7
16. Katsumi O, Hirose T, Sakaue H, Mehta M, Rosenstein RB. Effect of optical defocus on the steady state pattern reversal visual-evoked response. Ophthalmic Research 1990;22:383-90
17. Carr RE, Siegel IM. Visual Electrodiagnostic Testing: A Practical Guide for the Clinician. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1982
18. Chiappa KH, ed. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine. New York: Raven Press, 1989
19. Beck RW, Cleary MS, Anderson MM Jr, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;326:581-8
20. Papakostopoulos D. Telematic electrodiagnosis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1996;2 (suppl. 1):30-3
21. Brigell M, Kaufman DI, Bobak P, Beydoun A. The pattern visual evoked potential: a multicenter study using standardized techniques. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1994;86:65-79
22. Papakostopoulos D, Gogolitsyn Y. Optimised averaging by on-line statistical verification of response in clinical electrodiagnostic trials. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1994;16:155-62
23. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1980
24. Whyte HE, Pearce JM, Taylor MJ. Changes in the VEP in preterm neonates with arousal states, as assessed by EEG monitoring. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1987;68:223-5
25. Ikeda H, Tremain KE, Sanders MD. Neurophysiological investigation in optic nerve disease. Combined assessment of the visual evoked response and electroretinogram. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1978;62:227-39
26. Stefano E, Culini LM, Rizzo PA. Simultaneous recording of pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked potential (VEP) in multiple sclerosis. Neurologica Belgica 1991;19:20-8
27. Hammond SR, MacCallum S, Yiannikas C, Walsh JC, McLeod JG. Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1987;66:401-8
28. Hennerrici M, Wenzel D, Freund JH. The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain 1977;100:119-36
29. Kupersmith MF, Nelson JI, Seiple WH, Carr RE, Weiss PA. The 20/20 eye in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1983;33:1015-20
30. Stockard JJ, Hughes JF, Sharbrough FW. Visually evoked potentials to electronic pattern reversal: latency variation with gender age and technical factors. American Journal of EEG Technology 1979;19:171-204
31. Guthkelch AN, Bursick D, Sclabassi RJ. The relationship of the latency of the visual P100 wave to gender and head size. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1987;68:219-22
32. Oishi M, Yamada T, Dickins S, Kimura J. Visual evoked potentials by different check sizes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1985;85:1461-5
33. Kurita-Tashima S, Tobimatsu S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu M, Kato M. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1991;80: 161-6