Prism adaptation to dynamic events

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 161-176

  Field, Douglas P ^a   Shipley, Thomas F ^b   Cunningham, Douglas W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Logicon Technical Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0032609385     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211957     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. BAILY, J. S. (1972). Adaptation to prisms: Do proprioceptive changes mediate adapted behavior with ballistic arm movements? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 8-20.
2. BECKETT, P. A., & MELAMED, L. E. (1980). Further evidence dissociating decay and readaptation in prism adaptation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 73-75.
3. BEDFORD, F. L. (1989). Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 232-248.
4. BEDFORD, F. L. (1993a). Perceptual and cognitive spatial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 517-530.
5. BEDFORD, F. L. (1993b). Perceptual learning. Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 30, 1-60.
6. CATANIA, A. C. (1973). The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 1, 103-116.
7. CATANIA, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. COHEN, H. B. (1966). Some critical factors in prism-adaptation. American Journal of Psychology, 79, 285-290.
9. DINSMORE, J. A. (1995a). Stimulus control: Part I. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 51-68.
10. DINSMORE, J. A. (1995b). Stimulus control: Part II. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 253-269.
11. ESTES, W. K. (1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94-107.
12. FINK, J. B., & PATTON, R. M. (1953). Decrement of a learned drinking response accompanying changes in several stimulus characteristics. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 46, 23-27.
13. GIBSON, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 1-31.
14. GIBSON, J. J. (1937). Adaptation with negative after-effect. Psychological Review, 44, 222-244.
15. GOLDSTEIN, S. R., & HALL, D. (1990). Variable ratio control of the spitting response in the archer fish (Toxotes jaculator). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 373-376.
16. HANSON, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 321-334.
17. HARRIS, C. S. (1965). Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychological Review, 72, 419-444.
18. HARRIS, C. S. (1980). Insight or out of sight? Two examples of perceptual plasticity in the human adult. In C. S. Harris (Ed.), Visual coding and adaptability (pp. 95-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. HEALY, M. H., SYMMES, D., & OMMAYA, A. K. (1973). Visual discordance cues induce prism adaptation in normal monkeys. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 37, 683-693.
20. HELD, R. (1961). Exposure history as a factor in maintaining stability of perception and coordination. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 132, 26-32.
21. HELD, R., & HEIN, A. (1958). Adaptation to disarranged hand-eye coordination contingent upon re-afferent stimulation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 8, 87-90.
22. HESS, R. F, & DOSHI, S. (1995). Adaptation to spatial offsets. Perception, 24, 1407-1426.
23. HINELINE, P. N. (1992). A self-interpretive behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1274-1286.
24. HONIG, W. K., BONEAU, C. A., BURSTEIN, K. R., & PENNYPACKER, H. S. (1963). Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 56, 111-116.
25. HOWARD, I., CRASKE, B., & TEMPLETON, W. (1965). Visuomotor adaptation to discordant exafferent stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 189-191.
26. JENKINS, H. M., & HARRISON, R. H. (1960). Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 246-253.
27. KAISER, M. K., & PHATAK, A. V. (1993). Things that go bump in the light: On the optical specification of contact severity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 194-202.
28. KAISER, M. K., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1984). The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information. Child Development, 55, 1614-1624.
29. KIM, N. G., TURVEY, M. T., & CARELLO, C. (1993). Optical information about the severity of upcoming contacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 179-193.
30. KIMBLE, G. A. (1947). Conditioning as a function of the time between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 1-15.
31. LACKNER, J. R. (1974). Adaptation to displaced vision: Role of proprioception. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 38, 1251-1256.
32. LACKNER, J. R. (1977). Adaptation to visual and proprioceptive rearrangement: Origin of the differential effectiveness of active and passive movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 55-59.
33. LEE, D. N., & REDDISH, P. E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics. Nature, 293, 293-294.
34. MACINTOSH, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press.
35. MCBEATH, M. K. (1990). The rising fast-ball: Baseball's impossible pitch. Perception, 19, 545-552.
36. MCBEATH, M. K., SHAFFER, D. M., & KAISER, M. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268, 569-573.
37. MELAMED, L. E., MOORE, L. A., & BECKETT, P. A. (1979). Readaptation and decay after prism viewing: An exploration of task variables from the viewpoint of the information discordance hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 215-220.
38. MICHAELS, C. F., & OUDEJANS, R. R. D. (1992). The optics and actions of catching fly balls: Zeroing out optical acceleration. Ecological Psychology, 4, 199-122.
39. MICHOTTE, A., THINES, G., & CRABBE, G. (1964). Les complements amodaux des structures perceptives [Amodal completion of perceptual structures] (Studia Psycologica). Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.
40. MIKAELIAN, H. H. (1970). Adaptation to rearranged eye-foot coordination. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 222-224.
41. MOSTOFSKY, D. I. (ED.) (1965). Stimulus generalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42. MOULDEN, B. (1971). Adaptation to displaced vision: Reafference is a special case of the cue-discrepancy hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 113-117.
43. NEFF, W. S. (1930). A critical investigation of the visual apprehension of motion. American Journal of Psychology, 48, 1-42.
44. NEVIN, J. A. (1973). Stimulus control. In J. A. Nevin & G. S. Reynolds (Eds.), The study of behavior: Learning, motivation, emotion, and instinct (pp. 115-152). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
45. PEPER, C. E., BOOTSMA, R. J., MESTRE, D. R., & BAKKER, F. C. (1994). Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 591-612.
46. REDDING, G. M., & WALLACE, B. (1995, November). Prism adaptation during ball throwing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
47. REDDING, G. M., & WALLACE, B. (1997). Adaptive spatial alignment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. RUMELHART, D. E., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (EDS.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. SHEPARD, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
50. SIDMAN, M. (1969). Generalization gradients and stimulus control in delayed matching-to-sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 745-757.
51. SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. SIZEMORE, O. J., & LATTAL, K. A. (1977). Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 119-125.
53. SKINNER, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 40-65.
54. SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century.
55. SKINNER, B. F. (1965). Stimulus generalization in an operant: A historical note. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 193-209). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56. SKINNER, B. F. (1969). The role of the environment. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis (pp. 3-28). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
57. SPENCE, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427-449.
58. TERRACE, H. S. (1966). Stimulus control. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 271-344). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
59. TRESILIAN, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 865-876.
60. WALLACE, B. (1975). Prism adaptation to moving and stationary target exposures. Perception, 4, 341-347.
61. WALLACH, H. (1968). Informational discrepancy as a basis for perceptual adaptation. In S. Freedman (Ed.), The neurophysiology of spatially oriented behavior (pp. 235-258). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
62. WELCH, R. B. (1971). Discriminative conditioning of prism adaptation. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 90-92.
63. WELCH, R. B. (1978). Perceptual modification: Adapting to altered sensory environments. New York: Academic Press.