Productivity model for the cell formation problem: a simulated annealing algorithm

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 327-330

  Abdelmola, A I ^a   Taboun, S M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; MACHINERY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; PRODUCTIVITY; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING MODEL; PRODUCTIVITY MODEL;

CELLULAR MANUFACTURING;

EID: 0032599532     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00085-6     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. nd Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering Applications and Practice, San Diego, California, U. S. A., 779-784.
2. nd ICC &, the American University in Cairo, December 1997, pp. 124-127.
3. Chu, C. H. (1989). Cluster analysis in manufacturing cellular formation. International Journal of Management Science, 17, 289-295.
4. Heragu, S. S. (1994) Group technology and cellular manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 203-215.
5. Jayakrishran, N. G., and Narendran, T. T. (1998). Case: A clustering algorithm for cell formation with sequence data. International Journal of Production Research, 36, 157-179.
6. Joines, A. J., Culbreth, T. C., and King E. R. (1996). Manufacturing cell design: An integer programming model employing genetic algorithms. IEE Transactions, 28, 69-85.
7. King, J. R. and Nakornchai, V. (1982). Machine component group formation in group technology: Review and extension. International Journal of Production Research, 20, 117-133.
8. Kusiak, A. (1992). Group technology: Models and solution approaches. First Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings, 349-352.
9. Mosier, C. T., 1985, The facets of group technology and their impacts on implementation: A state-of-the-survey. International Journal of Management Science, 13, 381-391.