Characteristic piezocone response in Piedmont residual soils

Geotechnical Special Publication

Volumn , Issue 92, 1999, Pages 1-11

  Finke, Kimberly A ^a   Mayne, Paul W ^b   Klopp, Rick A ^c  

^a URS Greiner Woodward Clyde   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^c Fugro Geoteam Limited   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; PORE PRESSURE; SAND; SILT; SOIL MECHANICS;

PIEZOCONE PENETRATION TESTS; POREWATER PRESSURE; SLEEVE FRICTION;

SOIL TESTING;

EID: 0032594696     PISSN: 08950563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ajayi, L.A., and Balogun, L.A. (1988) Penetration Testing in Tropical Lateritic and Residual Soils - Nigerian Experience, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Penetration Testing, Vol. 1, Orlando, 315-328.
2. Barksdale, R.D., Bachus, R.C., and Calnan, M.B. (1982). Settlements of a Tower on Residual Soil. Engineering and Construction in Tropical and Residual Soils, ASCE Conference, Honolulu, 647-664.
3. Barksdale, R.D., Ferry, C.T. and Lawrence, J.D. (1986). Residual soil settlement from pressuremeter moduli, Use of In situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, GSP No. 6, ASCE, New York, 447-461.
4. Brahana, D.C., Wang, J. And Russo, R. (1998) Performance of in-situ testing Methods in predicting deep foundation capacity, Geotechnical Site Characterization, Vol. 2, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1225-1228.
5. Brown, D.A. and Vinson, J. (1998) Comparison of strength and stiffness parameters for a Piedmont residual soil, Geotechnical Site Characterization, Vol. 2, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1229-1234.
6. Campanella, R.G. and Robertson, P.K. (1988) Current status of the piezocone test, Penetration Testing 1988, Vol. 1, Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, 93-116.
7. Chen, B.S-Y. and Mayne, P.W. (1995). Type 1 and 2 piezocone evaluations of overconsolidation ratio in clays. Proceedings, Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Vol. 2, Swedish Geotechnical Society, Linköping, 143-148.
8. th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, India, 477-486.
9. Filho, P.R. and Queiroz De Carvalho, J.B. (1988). General report: building foundations in tropical lateritic and saprolitic soils, Proceedings, Second International Conference on Geomechanics in Tropical Soils, Singapore, 587-601.
10. Finke, K.A. (1998). Piezocone penetration testing in Piedmont residual soils, M.S. Thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 265 p.
11. Harris, D.E., and Mayne, P.W. (1994). Axial compression behavior of two drilled shafts in Piedmont residual soils, Proceedings, International Conference on Design and Construction of Deep Foundations, Vol. 2 (Orlando), Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 352-367.
12. Lunne, T., Powell, J.J.M., and Robertson, P.K. (1996). Use of piezocone tests in non-textbook materials, Advances in Site Investigation Practice, Thomas Telford, London, 438-451.
13. Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K., and Powell, J.J.M. (1997) Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice, Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall, London, 312 p.
14. Martin, G.K., and Mayne, P.W. (1998) Seismic flat dilatometer tests in Piedmont residual soils, Geotechnical Site Characterization, Vol. 2, Balkema Rotterdam, 837-843.
15. Martin, R.E. (1977) Estimating foundation settlements in residual soils, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103 (GT3), 197-212.
16. Mayne, P.W. and Dumas, C. (1997). Enhanced in-situ geotechnical testing for bridge foundation analysis, Transportation Research Record, No. 1569, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 26-35.
17. Mayne, P.W. and Frost, D.D. (1988) Dilatometer experience in Washington, D.C. and vicinity, Transportation Research Record 1169, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 16-23.
18. Mayne, P.W. and Harris, D.E. (1993). Axial Load-Displacement Behavior of Drilled Shaft Foundations in Piedmont Residuum, Federal Highway Administration Rept. No. 41-30-2175, prepared by Georgia Tech Research Corp., Atlanta, 163 p.
19. Mayne, P.W., Kulhawy, F.H., and Kay, J.N. (1990). Observations on the development of porewater pressures during piezocone penetration in clays, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 27, No. 4, 418-428.
20. Mayne, P.W., Mitchell, J.K., Auxt, J.A., and Yilmaz, R. (1995). U.S. national report on CPT. Proceedings, Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Vol. 1, Swedish Geotechnical Society, Linköping, 263-276.
21. Mullen, W.G., (1991). An evaluation of the utility of four in-situ test methods for transmission line foundation design, Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, 264 p.
22. Ortigao, J.A.R., Cunha, R.P., and Alves, L.S. (1996). In-situ tests in Brasilia porous clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 189-198.
23. Peuchen, J., Plasman, S.J., and van Steveninck, R. (1996). Cone penetration testing in tropical residual soils, Ground Engineering, Vol. 29 (1) 37-40.