Comparison of ThinPrep® and conventional preparations: Urine cytology evaluation [3]

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 364-366

  Luthra, U K ^a   Dey, P ^a   George, J ^a   Abdulla, M A ^a   Shaheen, A A A ^a   Sheikh, Z A ^a   George, S S ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRESERVATIVE; REAGENT;

CONTROLLED STUDY; FILTER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; URINE CYTOLOGY; BLADDER TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME; URINE; UROTHELIUM;

EVALUATION STUDIES; HISTOCYTOLOGICAL PREPARATION TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; URINE; UROTHELIUM;

EID: 0032589491     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199911)21:5<364::AID-DC16>3.0.CO;2-4     Document Type: Letter

References (8)