Topographic differences in taskdependent facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials

Neurology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 537-540

  Rossi, Fabian ^a   Triggs, William J ^a,b   Eisenschenk, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FACILITATION; FOREARM; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ISOMETRIC EXERCISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADULT; FEMALE; MAGNETISM; MALE; MUSCLE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MAGNETICS; MALE; MUSCLES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032588606     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.52.3.537     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brasil-Neto JP, Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Cammarota A, Cohen LG, Hallett M. Postexercise depression of motor evoked potentials: a measure of central nervous system fatigue. Exp Brain Res 1993;93:181-184.
2. Brasil-Neto JP, Cohen LG, Hallett M. Central fatigue as revealed by postexercise decrement of motor evoked potentials. Muscle Nerve 1994;17:713-719.
3. Samii A, Wassermann EM, Ikoma K, Mercuri B, Hallett M. Characterization of postexercise facilitation and depression of motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1996;46:1376-1382.
4. Triggs WJ, Calvanio R, Levine M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals a hemispheric asymmetry correlate of intermanual differences in motor performance. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:1355-1363.
5. Samii A, Canos M, Ikoma K, Wassermann EM, Hallett M. Absence of facilitation or depression of motor evoked potentials after contralateral homologous muscle activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;105:241-245.
6. Lawrence DG, Kuypers HG. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain 1968;91:1-14.
7. Tiffin J. Purdue Pegboard examiner manual. Chicago: Science Research Associates, Inc., 1968:1.
8. Porter R, Lemon RN. Corticospinal function and voluntary movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
9. Samii A, Wassermann EM, Hallett M. Post-exercise depression of motor evoked potentials as a function of exercise duration. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;105:352-356.
10. Cheney PD, Fetz EE. Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force. J Neurophysiol 1980;44:773-791.
11. Evarts EV, Fromm C, Kroller J, Jennings VA. Motor cortex control of finely graded forces. J Neurophysiol 1983;49:1199-1215.
12. Cheney PD, Fetz EE, Mewes K. Neural mechanisms underlying corticospinal and rubrospinal control of limb movements. Prog Brain Res 1991;87:213-252.
13. Brouwer B, Ashby P, Midroni G. Excitability of corticospinal neurons during tonic muscle contractions in man. Exp Brain Res 1989;74:649-652.
14. Muir RB, Lemon RN. Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip. Brain Res 1983;261:312-316.
15. Wannier TM, Maier MA, Hepp Reymond MC. Contrasting properties of monkey somatosensory and motor cortex neurons activated during the control of force in precision grip. J Neurophysiol 1991;65:572-589.