The 'incision benefit' in clinical trials

Journal of Pediatrics

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 130-131

  Lantos, J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; EDITORIAL; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; NEONATOLOGY; NEWBORN; NOTE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD;

ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; NEONATOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 0032587239     PISSN: 00223476     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(99)70400-2     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. B Schmidt P Gillie C Caco J Roberts R. Roberts Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial? J Pediatr 134 1999 151 155
2. DJ. Rothman Were Tuskegee & Willowbrook ‘studies in nature’? Hastings Cent Rep 12 1982 5 7
3. TC. Merigan You can teach an old dog new tricks. How AIDS trials are pioneering new strategies N Engl J Med 323 1990 1341 1343
4. N Daniels JE. Sabin Last chance therapies and managed care. Pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy Hastings Cent Rep 28 1998 27 41
5. ED Kodish RD Pentz RB Noll Informed consent in the Children’s Cancer Group: results of preliminary research Cancer 82 1998 2467 2481