Minimisation of process time in ultrafiltration and continuous diafiltration: The effect of incomplete macrosolute rejection

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 163, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 349-355

  Foley, Greg ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Concentration; Diafiltration; Optimisation; Rejection; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEMBRANE FILTER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME; ULTRAFILTRATION;

OPTIMIZATION;

DIAFILTRATION;

ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0032586508     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00179-9     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Dutré B., Trägårdh G. Macrosolute-microsolute separation by ultrafiltration: a review of diafiltration processes and applications. Desalination. 95:1994;227-267.
2. Howell J., Field R., Wu D. Ultrafiltration of high-viscosity solutions: theoretical developments and experimental findings. Chem. Eng. Sci. 51:1996;1405-1415.
3. Aimar P., Field R. Limiting flux in membrane separations: a model based on the viscosity dependency of the mass transfer coefficient. Chem. Eng. Sci. 47:1992;579-586.
4. Ng P., Lundblad J., Gautam M. Optimization of solute separation by diafiltration. Sep. Sci. 11:1976;499-502.
5. Cooper A.R., Booth R.G. Ultrafiltration of synthetic polymers Part I. Optimization of solvent flux during diafiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 13:1978;735-744.
6. M. Cheryan, Ultrafiltration Handbook. Technomic, Lancaster, PA, USA 1986.
7. Rajagopalan N., Cheryan M.E Process optimization in ultrafiltration: flux-time considerations in the purification of macromolecules Chem. Eng. Commun. 106:1991;57-69.
8. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vettering, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1992.