Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: Clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting

Lancet

Volumn 352, Issue 9138, 1998, Pages 1419-1425

  Henderson, Robert A ^a   Pocock, Stuart J ^b   Sharp, Stephen J ^b   Nanchahal, Kiran ^b   Sculpher, Mark J ^b   Buxton, Martin J ^b   Hampton, John R ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

EID: 0032585247     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03358-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. 1 The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217-25.
2. 2 CABRI trial participants. First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). Lancet 1995; 346: 1179-84.
3. 3 King SB, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS, et al. A randomized trial comparing angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1044-50.
4. 4 Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, et al. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1037-43.
5. 5 Rodriguez A, Mele A, Peyregne E, et al. Three-year follow-up of the Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1178-84.
6. 6 Carrié D, Elbaz M, Fuel J, et al. Five-year outcome after coronary angioplasty versus bypass surgery in multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 1997; 96 (suppl II): 1-6.
7. 7 Goy JJ, Eeckhout E, Burnand B, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Lancet 1994; 343: 1449-53.
8. 8 Hueb W, Bellotti G, Almeida de Oliveira S, et al. The medicine, angioplasty or surgery study (MASS): a prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1600-05.
9. 9 Henderson RA. The Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial protocol: a long term study of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with angina. Br Heart J 1989; 62: 411-14.
10. 10 RITA trial participants. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1993; 341: 573-80.
11. 11 Sculpher MJ, Seed P, Henderson RA, et al. Health service costs of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1994; 344: 927-30.
12. 12 Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976; 54: 522-23.
13. 13 Sheffield LT. Graded exercise test (GXT) for ischaemic heart disease: a submaximal test to a target heart rate. In: Exercise testing and training of apparently healthy individuals: a handbook for physicians. New York: American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, 1972: 35-38.
14. 14 NHS Executive. Health service cost index. Leeds: NHS Executive, 1997.
15. 15 HM Treasury. Economic appraisal in central government: a technical guide for government departments. London: HM Stationery Office, 1991.
16. 16 Kosinski AS, Barnhart HX, Weintraub WS, Guyton RA, King SB. Five year outcome after coronary surgery or coronary angioplasty: results from the Emory angioplasty vs surgery trial (EAST). Circulation 1995; 92 (suppl): I-543.
17. 17 Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Rickards AF, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery. Lancet 1995; 346: 1184-89.
18. 18 The BARI Investigators. Influence of diabetes on 5-year mortality and morbidity in a randomized trial comparing CABG and PTCA in patients with multivessel disease: the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularisation Investigation (BARI). Circulation 1997; 96: 1761-69.
19. 19 Bertrand ME. Long-term follow-up of European revascularisation trials. Presented at 68th Scientific Sessions, Amerian Heart Association, Anaheim, California, Nov 16, 1995.
20. 20 Aronson D, Bloomgarden Z, Rayfield EJ. Potential mechanisms promoting restenosis in diabetic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 528-35.
21. 21 King SB III. Is it important how one dies: questions for further revascularisation trials. Circulation 1997; 96: 2121-23.
22. 22 Writing Group for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Five-year clinical and functional outcome comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease: a multicenter randomized trial. JAMA 1997; 277: 715-21.
23. 23 Fitzgibbon GM, Leach AJ, Kafka HP, Keon WJ. Coronary bypass graft fate: long-term angiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 1075-80.
24. 24 Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC. Long-term (5-12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89: 248-58.
25. 25 Henderson RA, Raskino CL, Hampton JR. Variation in the use of coronary arteriography in the UK: the RITA coronary arteriogram register. Q J Med 1995; 88: 167-73.
26. 26 Detre KM, Rosen AD, Bost JE, et al. Contemporary practice of coronary revascularisation in U.S. hospitals and hospitals participating in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 609-15.
27. 27 Hlatky MA, Rogers WJ, Johnstone I, et al. Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 92-99.
28. 28 Weintraub WS, Mauldin PD, Becker E, Kosinski AS, King SB. A comparison of the costs of and quality of life after coronary angioplasty or coronary surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the Emory angioplasty versus surgery trial (EAST). Circulation 1995; 92: 2831-40.
29. 29 Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 153-62.
30. 30 Weintraub WS, Boccuzzi SJ, Klein JL, et al. Lack of effect of lovastatin on restenosis after coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1332-37.
31. 31 Serruys PW, van Hout B, Bonnier H, et al. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet 1998; 352: 673-81.
32. 32 Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501.
33. 33 Macaya C, Serruys P, Ruygrok P, et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: one-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 255-61.
34. 34 Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment. Coronary stents: clinical experience and cost-effectiveness. Ottawa, CCOHTA: 1997.
35. 35 EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularisation. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1689-96.
36. 36 Topol EJ, Fergus JJ, Weisman HL, et al. Long-term protection from myocardial ischemic events in a randomised trial of brief integrin 3 blockade with percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 1997; 278: 479-84.