Linking objective and subjective modelling for landuse decision-making

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 43, Issue 1-3, 1998, Pages 35-48

  Bantayan, Nathaniel C ^a   Bishop, Ian D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES LOS BAÑOS   (Philippines)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); GIS; Landuse

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GIS; LAND USE; MODELING;

MAKILING FOREST RESERVE; PHILIPPINES;

EID: 0032576558     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00101-7     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Banai-Kashani A.R. Dealing with uncertainty and fuzziness in development planning: a simulation of hightech industrial location decision-making by the analytic hierarchy process. Environment and Planning A. 22:1990;1183-1203.
2. Banai-Kashani R. A new method for site suitability analysis: the analytic hierarchy process. Environ. Manage. 13(6):1989;685-693.
3. Bantayan, N.C., 1997. GIS-based estimation of soil loss. In: The Pterocarpus, vol. 9. pp. 1, 24-35.
4. Bantayan, N.C., 1996. Participatory Decision Support Systems: The Case of the Makiling Forest Reserve. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
5. Bantayan, N.C., Bishop, I.D., 1993a. The role of GIS in integrating fuzziness and modelling in landuse planning. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference and Technical Exhibition, AURISA 93. Aurisa, Adelaide, South Australia.
6. Bantayan, N.C., Bishop, I.D., 1993b. An approach to combine fuzziness with a physical model for landuse planning using GIS. In: Proceedings of the Land Information Management and Geographic Information Systems (LIM & GIS) Conference. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
7. Barber G.M. Land-use plan design via interactive multiobjective programming. Environment and Planning A. 8:1976;625-636.
8. Batty, M., 1979. On planning processes. In: Goodall, B., Kirby, A. (Eds.), Resources and Planning. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 17-45.
9. Blin J.M., Whinston A.B. Fuzzy sets and social choice. J. Cybernetics. 3(4):1973;28-36.
10. Brule, J.F., 1992. Fuzzy systems - a tutorial. From baechtel@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com Newsgroup: comp.ai. 11 pp.
11. Carver S.J. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Int. J. Geographical Information Syst. 5(3):1991;321-339.
12. Dane, C.W., Meador, N.C., White, J.B., 1977. Goal programming in land-use planning. J. Forestry (June), 75(6) 325-329.
13. Fung, L.W., Fu, K.S., 1975. An axiomatic approach to rational decision-making in a fuzzy environment. In: Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications To Cognitive and Decision Processes. University of California, Berkeley, California, pp. 227-257.
14. Gupta, M.M., 1977. 'Fuzzy-ism', the first decade. In: Gupta, M., Saridis, G., Gaines, B. (Eds.), Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes, Elsevier North-Holland, New York, pp. 5-10.
15. Hall G.B., Wang F.et al. Comparison of Boolean and fuzzy classification methods in land suitability analysis by using geographical information systems. Environment and Planning A. 24:1992;497-516.
16. Hipel, K.W., 1982. Fuzzy set methodologies in multicriteria modelling. In: Gupta, M.M., Sanchez, E. (Eds.), Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 279-287.
17. Itami, R.M., Raulings, R.J., 1993a. SAGE Introductory Guidebook. Digital Land Systems Research, Melbourne, 106 pp.
18. Itami, R.M., Raulings, R.J., 1993b. SAGE Reference Manual. Digital Land Systems Research, Melbourne, 113 pp.
19. Jankowski P. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. Int. J. Geographical Information Syst. 9(3):1995;251-273.
20. Jankowski P., Richard L. Integration of GIS-based suitability analysis and multicriteria evaluation in a spatial decision support system for route selection. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 21:1994;323-340.
21. Jankowski P. Mixed-data multicriteria evaluation for regional planning: a systematic approach to the decision-making process. Environment and Planning A. 21:1989;349-362.
22. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M., 1985. Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic - Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 351 pp.
23. Lehmann, E.L., D'Abrera, H.J.M., 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA, 458 pp.
24. Leitner, H., Nijkamp, P., Wrigley, N., 1985. Qualitative spatial data analysis: a compendium of approaches. In: Nijkamp, P., Leitner, H., Wrigley, N. (Eds.), Measuring the Unmeasurable. Nijhoff (Martinus), Dordrecht, pp. 1-28.
25. Mendoza G.A., Sprouse W. Forest planning and decision-making under fuzzy environments: an overview and illustration. For. Sci. 35(2):1989;481-502.
26. Mendoza G.A., Bruce Bare B., Zhou Z. A fuzzy multiple objective linear programming approach to forest planning under uncertainty. Agric. Syst. 41:1993;257-274.
27. Nijkamp, P., Voogd, H., 1985. A survey of qualitative multiple criteria choice models. In: Nijkamp, P., Leitner, H., Wrigley, N. (Eds.), Measuring the Unmeasurable. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 425-427.
28. Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. Multi-objective programming models. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 6:1976;253-274.
29. Rehman T., Romero C. The application of the MCDM paradigm to the management of agricultural systems: some basic considerations. Agric. Syst. 41:1993;239-255.
30. Ridgley M.A., Giambelluca T.W. Linking water-balance simulation and multiobjective programming: land-use plan design in Hawaii. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 19:1992;317-336.
31. Ridgley M.A. Water and urban land-use planning in the developing world: a linked simulation-multiobjective approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 11:1984;229-242.
32. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process - Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 287 pp.
33. Smith P.N. Fuzzy evaluation of land-use and transportation options. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 19:1992;525-544.
34. Sobral M.M., Hipel K.W., Farquhar G.J. A multi-criteria model for solid waste management. J. Environ. Manage. 12:1981;97-110.
35. Takeda, E., 1975. Interactive identification of fuzzy outranking relations in a multicriteria decision problem. Paper read at Fuzzy information and decision processes.
36. Voogd, H., 1983. Multiple Criteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. Pion, London, 367 pp.
37. Whitley, D.L., Xiang, W.-N., Young, J.J., 1993. Use a GIS 'Melting Pot' to assess land use suitability. GIS World 6 (7).
38. Wischmeier W.H. A rainfall erosion index for a universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 23:1959;246-249.
39. Xiang W.-N., Gross M., Gy Fabos J., MacDougall E.B. A fuzzy-group multicriteria decision-making model and its application to land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 19:1992;61-84.
40. Xiang W.-N. A GIS/MMP-based coordination model and its application to distributed environmental planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 20:1993;195-220.
41. Zadeh, L.A., 1977. Fuzzy set theory: a perspective. In: Gupta, M., Saridis, G., Gaines, B. (Eds.), Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes. Elsevier North-Holland, New York, pp. 3-4.
42. Zimmermann, H.J., 1991. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Norwell, Massachusetts, Kluwer Academic Press.
43. Znotinas N.M., Hipel K.W. Comparison of alternative engineering designs. Water Resources Bull. 15(1):1979;44-59.