Post circumcision meatal stenosis: 12 years' experience

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 111, Issue 1060, 1998, Pages 57-58

  Upadhyay, V ^a   Hammodat, H M ^a   Pease, P W B ^a  

^a STARSHIP CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CIRCUMCISION; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; NEWBORN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; URETHRA STRICTURE;

CIRCUMCISION, MALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; URETHRAL STRICTURE;

EID: 0032570350     PISSN: 00288446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Persad R, Sharma S, McTavish J, et al. Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circumcision. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 91-3.
2. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics 1989; 83; 1011-5.
3. Niku SD, Stock JA, Kaplan GW. Neonatal circumcision. Urol Clin North Am 1995; 22: 57-65.
4. Kaplan GW. Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin of North Am 1983; 10: 543-9.
5. Gee WF, Ansell JS. Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the gomco clamp and the plastibell device. Pediatrics 1976; 58: 824-7.