Human scalp-recorded EEG may be a result of activity of weakly-coupled subsystems

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 250, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 72-74

  Sulimov, A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HIGHER NERVOUS ACTIVITY AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Chaos; Correlation dimension; EEG; Laplacian; Non linear dynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CHAOTIC DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP;

ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SCALP;

EID: 0032569076     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00455-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bullock, T.H., Agenda for Research on Chaotic Dynamics. In E. Basar (Ed.), Chaos in Brain Function, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, 1990, pp. 31-41.
2. Elbert T., Ray W.J., Kowalik Z.J., Skinner J.E., Graf K.E., Birbaumer N. Chaos and physiology: deterministic chaos in excitable cell assemblies. Physiol. Rev. 74:1994;1-47.
3. Grassberger P., Procaccia I. Measuring the strangeness of the strange attractors. Physica D. 9:1983;189-208.
4. Hjorth B. An on-line information of EEG scalp potential into orthogonal source derivation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 39:1975;526-530.
5. Jansen B.H. Quantitative analysis of electroencephalograms: is there chaos in the future? Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 27:1991;95-123.
6. Klein S.A., Carney T. The usefulness of the Laplacian in principal component analysis and dipole source localization. Brain Topogr. 8:1995;91-108.
7. Lorenz E.N. Dimension of weather and climate attractors. Nature. 353:1991;241-244.
8. Lutzenberger W., Elbert T., Ray W.J., Birbaumer N. The scalp distribution of the fractal dimension of the EEG and its variation with mental task. Brain Topogr. 5:1993;27-34.
9. Lutzenberger W., Preissl H., Pulvermüller F. Fractal dimension of electromagnetic time series and underlying brain processes. Biol. Cybern. 73:1995;477-482.
10. Nunez, P.L., Electric Fields of the Brain: Neurophysics of EEG, Oxford University Press, New York, 1981, 484 pp.
11. Pritchard W.S., Duke D.W., Krieble K.K. Dimensional analysis of resting EEG II: surrogate data testing indicates nonlinearity but not low-dimensional chaos. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;486-491.
12. Provenzale A., Smith L.A., Vio R., Murante G. Distinguishing between low-dimensional dynamics and randomness in measured time series. Physica D. 58:1992;31-49.
13. Röschke, J. and Başar E., Correlation dimensions in various parts of cat and human brain in different states. In E. Basar and T.H. Bullock (Eds.), Brain Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1989, pp. 131-148.
14. Soong A.C.K., Stuart C.I.J.M. Evidence of chaotic dynamics underlying the human alpha-rhythm electroencephalogram. Biol. Cybern. 62:1989;55-62.
15. Takens, F., Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In D.A. Rand and L.S. Young (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 898, Springer, Berlin, 1981, pp. 366-381.
16. Theiler J., Eubank S., Longtin A., Galdrikian B., Farmer J.D. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D. 58:1992;77-94.