Statistical simulation as an effective tool to evaluate and illustrate the advantage of experimental designs and response surface methods

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 42, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 51-61

  Brandvik, Per Johan ^a  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

Experimental designs; Response surface methods; Statistical simulation

Indexed keywords

OIL; OIL DISPERSANT; SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPERSION; METHODOLOGY; OIL SPILL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032563593     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00008-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. [1] D. Rosenthal, D. Arnold, Simulation of experimental data, the design of experiments and the analysis of results. Kinetics of catalyzed ester hydrolysis, J. Chem. Educ. 54 (5) (1977) 323-325.
2. [2] A. Vanzquez, R. Varon, J. Tudela, F. Garcia-Canovas, Kinetic characterization of a model for zymogen activation: an experimental design and kinetic data analysis, J. Mol. Catal. 79 (1-3) (1993) 347-363.
3. [3] A.Z. Khan, L. Aarons, Design and analysis of protein binding experiments, J. Theor. Biol. 140 (2) (1989) 145-166.
4. [4] F. Ahmed, Design and analysis of simulated chemical reactor experiments, J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci. 9 (1) (1985) 11-18.
5. [5] P.S. Daling, P.J. Brandvik, D. Mackay, Ø. Johansen, Characterisation of crude oils for environmental purposes, Oil Chem. Pollut. 7 (1991) 199-224, (1990/91).
6. [6] P.J. Brandvik, P.S. Daling, Optimisation of oil spill dispersant composition by mixture design and response surface methods, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 42 (1998) 61-70.
7. [7] P.J. Brandvik, P.S. Daling, Optimising oil spill dispersants as a function of oil type and weathering degree - a multivariate approach using partial least squares (PLS), Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 42 (1998) 71-89.
8. [8] C. Bocard, G. Castaing, C. Gatellier, Chemical oil dispersion in trials at sea and in laboratory tests: the key role of dilution processes, in: T. E. Allen (Ed.), Oil Spill Chemical Dispersants: Research, Experience and Recommendations, STP 840, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1984, pp. 125-142.
9. [9] C. Brochu, E. Pelletier, G. Caron, J.E. Desnoyers, Dispersion of crude oil in seawater: the role of synthetic surfactants, Oil Chem. Pollut. 3 (1987) 257-279, (1986/87).
10. [10] P.J. Brandvik, P.S. Daling, Statistical experimental design in the optimisation of dispersant's performance, Proceedings of the 13th AMOP-seminar, Environment Canada, Edmonton, 1990.
11. [11] O.Ø. Knudsen, P.S. Daling, Proposed procedure for dispersant testing - new Norwegian regulations for approval of dispersants, IKU Petroleum Research, Trondheim, Norway, Report no.: 94.147 (in Norwegian) (1994).
12. [12] J.A. Cornell, Experiments with Mixtures, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York, 1990.
13. [13] A.L. Khuri, J.A. Cornell, Response surfaces, Design and Analyses, Marcel Dekker, ASQC Quality Press, New York, 1987.
14. [14] H. Scheffé, Experiments with mixtures, J. R. Stat Soc. B 20 (2) (1958) 344-360.
15. [15] H. Scheffé, Simplex-centroid design for experiments with mixtures, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 25 (2) (1963) 235-263.
16. [16] D.R. Cox, A note on polynomial response functions for mixtures, Biometrica 58 (1) (1971) 155-159.
17. [17] N. Kettaneh-Wold, Analysis of mixture data with PLS, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 14 (1992) 57-69.
18. [18] H. Martens, T. Næs, Multivariate Calibration, Wiley, Chichester, 1989.
19. [19] O.M. Kvalheim, Interpretation of direct latent-variable projection methods and their aims and use in the analysis of multicomponent spectroscopic and chromatographic data, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 4 (1988) 11-25.
20. [20] G.E.P. Box, W.G. Hunter, J.S. Hunter, Statistics for experimenters, An introduction to design, data analysis and model building, Wiley, New York, 1978.
21. [21] S.N. Deming, S.L. Morgan, Experimental design: a chemometric approach, in: Data handling in science and technology, Vol. 3, 1987.
22. [22] H. Passing, W. Bablok, M. Glocke, The establishment of assigned values in control serums: IV. An optimized design for the establishment of assigned values in control serums, J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 19 (12) (1981) 1167-1179.
23. [23] J.A. Cornell, A comparison between two ten-point designs for studying three-component mixture systems, J. Qual. Technol. 18 (1986) 1-15.