An update on dental imaging

British Dental Journal

Volumn 185, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 166-172

  Whaites, E ^a   Brown, J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIATION AND RADIATION RELATED PHENOMENA; RADIATION DOSE; REVIEW; STANDARD; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RADIOLOGIC HEALTH; X-RAY FILM; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0032558257     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809765     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. The ionising radiation regulations 1985 approved code of practice: the protection of persons against ionising radiation arising from any work activity. London: HMSO.
2. The ionising radiation (protection of persons undergoing medical examination or treatment) regulations 1988. No. 778. London: HMSO.
3. Radiation protection in dental practice. London: DoH, 1988.
4. NRPB 1994 Guidelines on radiology standards in primary dental care. National Radiological Protection Board, 1994; 5(3).
5. Ricketts D, Whaites E, Kidd EAM, Brown J, Wilson R. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 51-58.
6. Whaites E, Kidd E A M Predictable intra-oral radiographs. Dent Update 1995; 22: 230-236.
7. Frederiksen N L. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1995; 80: 540-554.
8. Grondahl K, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl H-G. A multimodal unit for comprehensive dentomaxillofacial radiology. Dent Update 1993; 20: 436-440.
9. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1989; 4: 327-332.
10. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. Clin Oral implants Research 1992; 3:90-97.
11. Frederiksen N L, Benson B W, Sokolowski T W. Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex. Dentomaxillofac Radial 1995; 24: 55-58.
12. Frederiksen N L, Benson B W, Sokolowski T W. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics, Dentomaxillofac Radial 1994; 23: 123-127.
13. Gray R J, Quayle A A, Horner K, Al-Gorashi A J. The effects of positioning variations in transcranial radiographs of the temporomandibular joint: a laboratory study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 29: 241-249.