A comparison of low volume, draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. III. Surfactant-based formulations

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 209-231

  Gettings, S D ^a   Lordo, R A ^b   Feder, P I ^b   Hintze, K L ^c  

^a and Fragrance Association   (United States)

^b BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternatives; Concordance analysis; CTFA (Phase III); Draize test; Eye irritation; In vitro; Low volume eye test (LVET); Regression modelling; Surfactant based personal care formulations

Indexed keywords

SURFACTANT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG FORMULATION; EYE IRRITATION; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALCOHOLS; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; COSMETICS; EMULSIONS; EYE; IRRITANTS; OILS; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; RABBITS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TOXICITY TESTS; WATER;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 0032549414     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00135-X     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Society for Testing and Materials (1985) Standard method for evaluation of eye irritation in albino rabbits, E1055-85. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia.
2. Bruner L. H., Parker R. D., Bruce R. D. Reducing the number of rabbits in the low-volume eye test. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 19:1992;330-335.
3. Cormier E. M., Hunter J. E., Billhimer W., May J., Farage M. A. Use of clinical and consumer eye irritation data to evaluate the low-volume eye test. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous Ocular Toxicology. 14:1995;197-205.
4. Cormier E. M., Parker R. D., Henson C., Cruse L. W., Merritt A. K., Bruce R. D., Osborne R. Determination of the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of the low volume eye test and its statistical relationship to the Draize eye test. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 23:1996;156-161.
5. Draize J. H., Woodard G., Calvery H. O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 82:1944;377-390.
6. Draize J. H. (1959) "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs, and Cosmetics - Dermal Toxicity", Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States, pp. 46-59.
7. Efron B. (1982) In The Jacknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans (Chapter 5, The Bootstrap). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp. 27-36.
8. Epa Labelling requirements for pesticides and devices. Proposed Rule. Federal Register. 49:1984;37960.
9. Feder P. I., Lordo R. A., Dipasquale L. C., Bagley D. M., Chudkowski M., Demetrulias J. L., Hintze K. L., Marenus K. D., Pape W. J. W., Roddy M. T., Schnetzinger R., Silber P., Teal J. J., Weise S. L., Gettings S. D. The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test. (Phase I) Hydro-alcoholic formulations; (Part 1) Statistical methods. In Vitro Toxicology. 4:1991;231-246.
10. Freeberg F. E., Griffith J. F., Bruce R. D., Bay P. H. S. Correlation of animal test methods with human experience for household products. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 3(1):1984;53-64.
11. Freeberg F. E., Hooker D. T., Griffith J. F. Correlation of animal eye test data with human experience for household products: an update. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 5:1986;115-223.
12. Freeberg F. E., Mixon G. A., Reer P. J., Weaver J. E., Bruce R. D., Griffith J. F., Saunders L. W. III Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 7:1986;626-634.
13. Gettings S. D., McEwen G. N. Jr. Development of potential alternatives to the Draize eye test: the CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program. ATLA. 17:1990;317-324.
14. Gettings S. D., Teal J. J., Bagley D. M., Demetrulias J. L., Dipasquale L. C., Hintze K. L., Rozen M. G., Weise S. L., Chudkowski M., Marenus K. D., Pape J. W., Roddy M. T., Schnetzinger R., Silber P. M., Glaza S. M., Kurtz P. J. The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test (Phase 1) Hydro-alcoholic formulations; (Part 2) Data analysis and biological significance. In Vitro Toxicology. 4:1991;247-288.
15. Gettings S. D., Dipasquale L. C., Bagley D. M., Casterton P. L., Chudkowski M., Curren R. D., Demetrulias J. L., Feder P. I., Galli C. L., Gay R., Glaza S. M., Hintze K. L., Janus J., Kurtz P. J., Lordo R. A., Marenus K. D., Moral J., Muscatiello M. J., Pape W. J. W., Renskers K. J., Roddy M. T., Rozen M. G. The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test. (Phase II) Oil/water emulsions. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 32:1994;943-976.
16. Gettings S. D., Lordo R. A., Hintze K. L., Bagley D. M., Casterton P. L., Chudkowski M., Curren R. D., Demetrulias J. L., Dipasquale L. C., Earl L. K., Feder P. I., Galli C. L., Gay R., Glaza S. M., Gordon V. C., Janus J., Kurtz P. J., Marenus K. D., Moral J., Pape W. J. W., Renskers K. J., Rheins L. A., Roddy M. T., Rozen M. G., Tedeschi J. P., Zyracki J. The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of potential in vitro alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test. (Phase III) Surfactant-based formulations. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 34:1996;79-117.
17. Gettings S. D., Lordo R. A., Demetrulias J. L., Feder P. I., Hintze K. L. Comparison of low-volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data I. Hydroalcoholic formulations. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 34:1996;737-749.
18. Gettings S. D., Lordo R. A., Feder P. I. and Hintze K. L. (1997) Comparison of low-volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. II. Oil/Water Emulsions. Food and Chemical Toxicology 36, 47-59.
19. Griffith J. F., Mixon G. A., Bruce R. D., Reer P. J., Bannan E. A. Dose response studies with chemical irritants in albino rabbit eye as a basis for selecting optimum testing conditions for predicting hazard to the human eye. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 55:1980;501-513.
20. Hammersley J. M. and Handscomb D. C. (1967) In Monte Carlo Methods (Chapter 4, Direct Simulation). pp. 43-49. Methuen & Co. London.
21. Kay J. H. and Calandra J. C. (1962) Interpretation of eye irritation tests. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 12, 281-289.
22. NIH (1985) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, NIH Publication No. 85-23, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
23. Shapiro S. S., Wilk M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 52:1965;591-611.
24. Williams S. J., Graepel G. J., Kennedy G. L. Evaluation of ocular irritancy potential: interlaboratory variability and effect of dosage volume. Toxicology Letters. 12:1982;235-241.