Maize canopies under two soil water regimes II. Seasonal trends of evapotranspiration, carbon dioxide assimilation and canopy conductance, and as related to leaf area index

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 89, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 185-200

  Steduto, Pasquale ^a,b   Hsiao, Theodore C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ISTITUTO AGRONOMICO MEDITERRANEO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Evapotranspiration; Leaf area index; Maize canopy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032549049     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00084-1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Acevedo, H.E., 1975. The growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions as affected by its water relations. PhD Diss., University of California, Davis. 180 pp.
2. Al-Kaisi M., Brun L.J., Enz J.W. Transpiration and evaporation from maize as related to leaf area index. Agric. For. Meteorol. 48:1989;111-116.
3. Allen R.G., Smith M., Perrier A., Pereira L.S. An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bull. 43(2):1994;1-33.
4. Bailey W.G., Davies J.A. The effect of uncertainty in aerodynamic resistance on evaporation estimates from the combination model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 20:1981;187-199.
5. 4 (corn) canopy: I. The partitioning of available energy into latent and sensible heat exchange. Agric. For. Meteorol. 67:1994;191-220.
6. 2 exchange and water use efficiency. Agric. For. Meteorol. 67:1994;291-321.
7. 2-water flux ratio of alfalfa. Agric. For. Meteorol. 23:1981;231-244.
8. Biscoe P.V., Scott R.K., Monteith J.L. Barley and its environment: III. Carbon budget of the stand. J. Appl. Ecol. 12:1975;269-293.
9. Bradford, K.J., Hsiao, T.C., 1982. Physiological responses to moderate water stress. In: Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H. (Eds.), Physiological Plant Ecology: II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Vol. 12B, (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology N.S.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 264-324.
10. Brun L.J., Kanemasu E.T., Powers W.L. Evapotranspiration from soybean and sorghum fields. Agron. J. 64:1972;145-148.
11. Connor D.J., Palta J.A., Jones T.R. Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation: III. Crop photosynthesis and transpiration. Field Crops Res. 12:1985;281-293.
12. 2 above corn using a microcomputer system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 32:1984;257-265.
13. de Wit, C.T., 1958. Transpiration and crop yields. Versl. Landbouwk. Onderz. 64.6. Institute of Biological and Chemical Research on Field Crops and Herbage, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
14. Doorenbos, J., Pruitt, W.O., 1977. Crop Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24, FAO, Rome, 179 pp.
15. 2 assimilation and comparison with a canopy chamber. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 42:1990;203-213.
16. Hsiao, T.C., 1982. The soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in relation to drought and crop production. In: Drought Resistance in Crops, with Emphasis on Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 39-52.
17. Hsiao, T.C., 1990. Measurement of plant water status. In: Steward, B.A., Nielsen, D.R. (Eds.), Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Vol. 30, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 243-279.
18. Hsiao, T.C., Fereres, E., Acevedo, E., Henderson, D.W., 1976. Water stress and dynamics of growth and yield of crop plants. In: Lange, O.L., Kappen, L., Shulze, E.D. (Eds.), Water and Plant Life. Ecological Studies. Analysis and Synthesis. Vol. 19. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 281-305.
19. Jones, H.G., 1983. Plants and Microclimate. A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge University Press, London, 323 pp.
20. Jones J.W., Zur B., Bennett J.M. Interactive effects of water and nitrogen stresses on carbon and water vapor exchange of corn canopies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38:1986;113-126.
21. Kelliher F.M., Leuning R., Raupach M.R., Shulze E.D. Maximum conductances for evaporation from global vegetation types. Agric. For. Meteorol. 73:1995;1-16.
22. Lee X., Black T.A. Atmospheric turbulence within and above Douglas-Fir stand: Part II. Eddy fluxes of sensible heat and water vapour. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 64:1993;369-389.
23. 2 fluxes above alfalfa and maize. Agric. For. Meteorol. 49:1990;331-349.
24. McNaughton, K.G., Spriggs, T.W., 1989. An evaluation of the Priestley and Taylor equation and the complementary relationship using results from a mixed-layer model of the convective boundary layer. In: Black, T.A., Spittlehouse, D.L., Novak, M.D., Price, D.T. (Eds.), Estimation of Areal Evapotranspiration. IAHS Press Publ. no. 177, Wallingford, pp. 89-104.
25. Owen P.R., Thomson W.R. Heat transfer across rough surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 15:1963;321-334.
26. 2 assimilation rate of maize (Zea mays L.) canopy from leaf chamber measurements. Agric. For. Meteorol. 55:1991;37-57.
27. Pearson C.J., Larson E.M., Hesketh J.D., Peters D.B. Development and source-sink effects on single leaf and canopy carbon dioxide exchange in maize. Field Crops Res. 9:1984;391-402.
28. Priestley C.H.B., Taylor R.J. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Rev. 100:1972;81-92.
29. Puech-Suanzes I., Hsiao T.C., Fereres E., Henderson D.W. Water stress effects on the carbon exchange rates of three upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars in the field. Field Crops Res. 21:1989;239-255.
30. Ritchie J.T., Burnett E. Dryland evaporative flux in subhumid climate: II. Plant influences. Agron. J. 63:1971;56-62.
31. Rochette P., Pattey E., Desjardins R.L., Dwyer L.M., Stewart D.W., Dube P.A. Estimation of maize (Zea mays L.) canopy conductance by scaling up leaf stomatal conductance. Agric. For. Meteorol. 54:1991;241-261.
32. Sale P.J.M. Net carbon exchange rates of field-grown crops in relation to irradiance and dry weight accumulation. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 4:1977;555-569.
33. Snyder, R.L., Pruitt, W.O., 1992. Evapotranspiration Data Management in California. Irrigation and Drainage Session Proceedings/Water Forum '92. EE, HY, IR, WR Div/ASCE, Baltimore, MD, pp. 128-133.
34. 2 Fluxes of post-anthesis maize in the field under two soil-water regimes: leaf vs. canopy scale. PhD Diss, University of California, Davis. 217 pp.
35. Steduto P., Hsiao T.C. Maize canopies under two soil water regimes: I. Diurnal patterns of energy balance, carbon dioxide flux and canopy conductance. Agric. For. Meteorol. 89:1998;173-188.
36. Steduto P., Hsiao T.C. Maize canopies under two soil water regimes: III. Variations in coupling with the atmosphere and the role of leaf area index. Agric. For. Meteorol. 89:1998;205-217.
37. Steduto P., Hsiao T.C. Maize canopies under two soil water regimes: IV. Validity of Bowen ratio-energy balance technique for measuring water vapor and carbon dioxide fluxes at 5-min intervals. Agric. For. Meteorol. 89:1998;219-232.
38. Tanner, C.B., Sinclair, T.R., 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: research or research? In: Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. Taylor, H.M., Jordan, W.R., Sinclair, T.R. (Eds.), Agron. Soc. Am., Madison, WI, pp. 1-27.
39. Thom A.S. Momentum, mass and heat exchange of vegetation. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 98:1972;124-134.
40. van Bavel C.H.M. Changes in canopy resistance to water loss from alfalfa induced by soil water depletion. Agric. Meteorol. 4:1967;165-176.
41. Wall G.W., Kanemasu E.T. Carbon dioxide exchange rates in wheat canopies: Part I. Influence of canopy geometry on trends in leaf area index, light interception and instantaneous exchange rates. Agric. For. Meteorol. 49:1990;89-102.
42. 2 from litter, humus and sub-soil of a pine stand. Pedobiologia. 9:1969;358-365.
43. Wolfe D.W., Henderson D.W., Hsiao T.C., Alvino A. Interactive water and nitrogen effects on senescence of maize: II. Photosynthesis decline and longevity of individual leaves. Agron. J. 80:1988;865-870.