Impacts of live canopy pruning on the chemical constituents of Douglas-fir vascular tissues: Implications for black bear tree selection

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 109, Issue 1-3, 1998, Pages 51-56

  Kimball, Bruce A ^a   Nolte, Dale L ^a   Griffin, Doreen L ^a   Dutton, Steve M ^b   Ferguson, Steve ^b  

^a NATIONAL WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forage preference; Forest management; Pruning; Silviculture; Ursus americanus

Indexed keywords

BEAR; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONIFEROUS TREE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; PRUNING;

PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; URSUS AMERICANUS;

EID: 0032538103     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00260-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barnes V.G. Jr., Engeman R.M. Black bear damage to lodgepole pine in Central Oregon. Northwest. Nat. 76:1995;127-129.
2. Bryant, J.P., Kuropat, P.J., Reichardt, P.B., Clausen, T.P., 1991a. Controls over the allocation of resources by woody plants to chemical antiherbivore defense. In: Palo, R.T., Robbins, C.T. (Eds.), Plant Defenses against mammalian herbivory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 83-102.
3. Bryant, J.P., Provenza, F.D., Pastor, J., Reichardt, P.B., Clausen, T.P., du Toit, J.T., 1991b. Interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary metabolites. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22, 431-446.
4. Cork, S.J., Foley, W.J., 1991. Digestive and metabolic strategies of arboreal mammalian folivores in relation to chemical defenses in temperate and tropical forests. In: Palo, R.T., Robbins, C.T. (Eds.), Plant Defenses against mammalian herbivory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 133-166.
5. Foley, W.J., McLean, A., Cork, S.J., 1995. Consequences of biotransformation of plant secondary metabolites on acid-base metabolism in mammals - A final common pathway? J. Chem. Ecol. 21, 721-743.
6. Illius A.W., Jessop N.S. Modeling metabolic costs of allelochemical ingestion by foraging herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1995;693-719.
7. Kanaskie, A., Chetock, J., Irwin, G., Overhulser, D., 1990. Black bear damage to forest trees in Northwest Oregon 1988-1989, Pest Management Report 90-1, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR.
8. Karban R., Meyers J.H. Induced plant responses to herbivory. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 20:1989;331-348.
9. Kimball B.A., Craver R.K., Johnston J.J., Nolte D.L. Quantitative analysis of the mono- and sesquiterpenoids of Douglas-fir vascular tissue by solvent extraction and gas chromatography with mass selective detection. J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 18:1995;221-225.
10. Kimball, B.A., Nolte, D.L., Engeman, R.M., Johnston, J.J., Stermitz. F.R., Chemically mediated foraging preference of black bears (Ursus americanus). J. Mammal. (in press).
11. Kramer, P.J., Kozlowski, T.T., 1979. Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, NY, p. 811.
12. Langstrom B., Hellqvist C. Effects of different pruning regimes on growth and sapwood area of Scots pine. For Ecol. Manage. 44:1991;239-254.
13. Mason A.C., Adams D.L. Black bear damage to thinned timber stands in Northwest Montana. West. J. Appl. For. 4:1989;10-13.
14. O'Hara K.L. A biological justification for pruning in coastal Douglas-fir stands. West. J. Appl. For. 6:1991;59-63.
15. O'Hara K.L., Larvik D.A., Valappil N.I. Pruning costs for four Northern Rocky Mountain species with three equipment combinations. West. J. Appl. For. 10:1995;59-65.
16. Ott, L., 1993. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA, USA. p. 818.
17. Palo, R.T., Robbins, C.T., 1991. Plant Defenses against mammalian herbivory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 192.
18. Provenza F.D. Tracking variable environments: There is more than one kind of memory. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1995;911-923.
19. Provenza F.D., Pfister J.A., Cheney C.D. Mechanisms of learning in diet selection with reference to phytotoxicosis in herbivores. J. Range Manage. 45:1992;36-45.
20. Rocklin R.D., Pohl C.A. Determination of carbohydrates by anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 6:1983;1577-1590.
21. SAS, 1990. SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 6, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
22. SMC, 1997. The newsletter of the Stand Management Cooperative, Spring 1997. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
23. Schmidt, W.C., Gourley, M., 1992. Chap. 15: Black bear. In: Black, H.C. (Ed.), Silvicultural approaches to animal damage management in pacific northwest forests. USDA Technical Report PNW-GTR-287, pp. 309-331.
24. Sclafani, A., 1990. Nutritionally based learned flavor preferences in rats. In: Capaldi, E.D., Powley, T.L. (Eds.), Taste, experience, and feeding. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 139-156.