Comparison between a lyse-and-then-wash method and a lyse-non-wash technique for the enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells

Communications in Clinical Cytometry

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 264-271

  Menendez P ^a,c   Redondo, O ^a   Rodriguez, A ^a   Lopez Berges, M C ^b   Ercilla, G ^a   Lopez A ^a   Duran A ^b   Almeida, J ^a   Perez Simon J A ^a   San Miguel, J F ^a   Gratama, J W ^b   Orfao, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

CD34+ cells; Flow cytometry; Immunofluorescence; Techniques; Transplantation

Indexed keywords

CD34 ANTIGEN; GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CENTRIFUGATION; CYTOLYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HEMATOPOIETIC CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; LEUKAPHERESIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL;

ANTIGENS, CD19; ANTIGENS, CD34; BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL COUNT; CENTRIFUGATION; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS; HUMANS; LEUKAPHERESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0032534895     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19981215)34:6<264::AID-CYTO4>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bender JG, To LB, Williams S, Schwatzberg LS: Defining a therapeutic dose of peripheral blood stem cells. J Hematother 1:329-41, 1992.
2. Bossuy X, »Marti GE, Fleisher TA: Comparative analysis of whole blood lysis methods for flow cytometry. Cytometry 30:124-133, 1997.
3. Chang A, Ma DDF: The influence of flow cytometric gating strategy on the standardization of CD34+ cell quantitation: an Australian multicenter study. J Hematother 5:605-616, 1996.
4. Fritsch G, Printz D, Stimpfl M, Dworzak MM, Witt V, Pötschger U, Buchinger P: Quantification of CD34 + cells: comparison of methods. Transfusion 37:775-784, 1997.
5. Kotylo PK, Sample RB, Redmond ML, I libner GC: Reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets. A comparison of standard vs rapid whole-blood lysis techniques. Arch Pathol Lab Med 115:181-4, 1991.
6. Krause DS, Fackler MJ, Civin CI, Stratford May W: CD34 Structure, biology and clinical utility. Blood 87:1-13, 1996.
7. Kreissig C, Kirsch A, Serke S: Characterization and measurement of CD34- expressing hematopoietic cells. J Hematother 3:263-89, 1994.
8. Lumley MA, McDonald DF, Czamecka I IM, Billingham LJ, Milligan DW: Quality assurance of CD34+ cell estimation in leukapheresis products. Bone Marrow Transplant 18:791-796, 1996.
9. Macedo A, Orfao A, Ciudad J, Gonzalez M, Vidriales D, Lopez-Berges MC, Martínez A, Landolfi C, Canizo C, San Miguel JF: Phenotipic analysis of CD34 subpopulations in normal human bone marrow and its application for the detection of minimal residual disease. Leukemia 9:1896-1901, 1995.
10. Orfao A, Escribano L, Villarubia J, Velasco JL, Cervero C, Ciudad J, NavarroJL, San Miguel JF: Flow cytometric analysis of mast cells from normal and pathological human bone marrow samples. Identification and enumeration. AmJ Pathol 1-49:1493, 1996.
11. Orfao A, Carbajo S, Dolbeare F, Ciudad J, Lopez A, Carbajo Ferez E: Comparison of Vindelov et al. and the bromodeoxyuridine/DNA double-staining flow cytometry methods for analysis of cell cycle distribution in rat thymocytes. Cytometry 25:104-108, 1996.
12. Perez-Simön JA, Caballero MD, Corral M, Nieto MJ, Orfao A, Vazquez L, Amigo ML, Berges C, Gonzalez M, del Canizo C, San Miguel JF: Mininal number of circulating CD34+ cells to assure successful leukapheresis and engraftment in autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Transfusion 38:385-391, 1998.
13. Säuberlich S, Kirsch A, Serke S: Determination of CD34 + hematopoietic cells by multiparameter flow cytometry: technical remarks. E. Wunder, Sovalat H, Henon R, Serke S. Hematopoietic Stem Cells. The Mulhouse Manual. Alpha Med Press, Dayton, Ohio, 1994;45-60.
14. Schwella N, Beyer J, Schwaner I, Heuft II, Rick O, Huhn D, Serke S, Siegert W: Impact of preleukapheresis cell counts on collection results and correlation of progenitor cell dose with engraftment after high dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 4:1114-1121, 1996.
15. Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-yee I: The ISI1AGE guidelines for CD34 + cells determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother 5:213-226, 1996.
16. Terstappen IAVMM, Shah VO, Conrad MP, Recktenwald D, Loken MR: Discriminating between damaged and intact cells in fixed flow cytometric samples. Cytometry 9:477-484, 1988.
17. Terstappen LWMM, Huang S, Safford M, Lansdorp PM, Loken MR: Sequential generations of hematopoietic colonies derived from single nonlineage-committed CD34+CD38- progenitor cells. Blood 77: 1218-1227, 1991.
18. Verwer BJH, Ward DM: An automated classification algorithm for ProCOUNT™ flow cytometric acquisition and analysis. J Hematother 6:169, 1997.
19. Ward T, Grenier K, Knape C, Cadden M, Schmidt J, Verwer B: ProCOUNT™: setting the standard for progenitor cell enumeration. Becton Dickinson Inmunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 1997.
20. Wunder E, Sovalat II, Fritsch, Silvestri F, Hénon P, Serke S.: Report on the European Workshop on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Determination and Standardization-Mulhouse, France, February 6-8 and 14-14, 1992: J Hematother 2:131-142, 1992.
21. Zimmerman TM, Lee WJ, Bender JH, et al: Quantitative CD34 analysis may be used to guide peripheral blood stem cell harvests: Bone Marrow Transplant 15:439-444,1995.