Synthesis and phototoxic property of tetra- and octa-glycoconjugated tetraphenylchlorins

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 24, 1998, Pages 3543-3548

  Mikata, Yuji ^a   Onchi, Yoko ^a   Shibata, Minako ^b   Kakuchi, Toyoji ^b   Ono, Hiroshi ^c   Ogura, Shun Ichiro ^d   Okura, Ichiro ^d   Yano, Shigenobu ^a  

^a NARA WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^d TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Glycosides; Oxygen; Photodynamic therapy; Porphyrin and analogues; Singlet

Indexed keywords

BENZOFURAN DERIVATIVE; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; GLYCOCONJUGATE; N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE; PORPHYRIN DERIVATIVE; SINGLET OXYGEN; TETRAKIS(3 HYDROXYPHENYL)CHLORIN; TETRAPHENYLPORPHINESULFONIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG PENETRATION; DRUG SOLUBILITY; DRUG SYNTHESIS; GLYCOSYLATION; HELA CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; PHOTOTOXICITY;

GLYCOCONJUGATES; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; PHOTOSENSITIZING AGENTS; PORPHYRINS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032534835     PISSN: 0960894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-894X(98)00645-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1. M. Ochsner, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 1997, Biol.39, 1.
2. 1. M. Ochsner, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 1997, Biol.39, 1.
3. 2. R. Bonnett, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 24, 19.
4. 3. M. Momenteau, D. Oulmi, P. Maillard, A. Croisy, SPIE, Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer II 1994, 2325, 13.
5. 4. D. Oulmi, P. Maillard, J.-L. Guerquin-Kern, C. Huel, M. Momenteau, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1554.
6. 5. P. Maillard, C. Hery, M. Momenteau, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3731.
7. 6. V. Sol, J. C. Blais, G. Bolbach, V. Carre, R. Granet, M. Guilloton, M. Spiro, P. Krausz, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6391.
8. 7. Y. Mikata, Y. Onchi, K. Tabata, S. Ogura, I. Okura, H. Ono, S. Yano, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4505.
9. 8. K. R. Adams, N. C. Berenbaum, R. Bonnet, A. N. Nizhnik, A. Salgado, M. A. Vallés, J. Chem. Soc. perkin trans 1, 1992, 1465.
10. 9. H. W. Whitlock, Jr., R. Hanauer, M. Y. Oester, B. K. Bower, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 7485.
11. 10. R. Bonnett, R. D. White, U.-J. Winfield, M. C. Berenbaum, Biochem. J. 1989, 261, 277.
12. 1/2 = 5.5 Hz, NH), 1.381 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 1.468 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 1.476 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 1.584 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 1.969 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 1.983 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 1.984 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 1.991 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 2.015 (12H, s, Ac × 4), 2.018 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 2.021 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 2.077 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 2.090 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 2.101 (6H, s, Ac × 2), 2.107 (6H, s, Ac × 2)
13. 12. S. Kawanishi, S. Inoue, S. Sano, H. Aiba, J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 6090.
14. 13. J. Davila, A. Harriman, Photochem. Photobiol. 1990, 51, 9.
15. 14. S. Nakajima, H. Hayashi, Y. Omote, Y. Yamazaki, S. Hirata, T. Maeda, Y. Kubo, T. Takamura, Y. Kakiuchi, Y. Shindo, K. Koshimizu, I. Sakata, J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1990, B7, 189.
16. 15. The reason of this surprising result was preliminary investigated. Octanol/water partition coefficients of these compounds showed the sugar dependent lipophilicity change, however, no meaningful difference between compounds 1a and 5 was detected. Further details are now under investigation in our laboratory.