Evaluating sensory conflict and postural instability. Theories of motion sickness

Brain Research Bulletin

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 465-469

  Warwick Evans, L A ^a   Symons, N ^a   Fitch, T ^a   Burrows, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Motion sickness; Postural instability; Sensory conflict

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MOTION SICKNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THEORY; VESTIBULAR SYSTEM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOTION SICKNESS; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0032534160     PISSN: 03619230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00090-2     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Graybiel, A.; Wood, C. D.; Miller, E. F.; Cramer, D. B. Diagnostic criteria for grading the severity of acute motion sickness. Aerospace Med. 39, May:453-455; 1968.
2. Reason J.T., Brand J.J. Motion sickness. 1975;Academic Press, London.
3. Riccio G.E., Stoffregen T.A. An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecol. Psychol. 3:1991;195-240.
4. Stoffregen T.A., Riccio G.E. An ecological critique of the sensory conflict theory of motion sickness. Ecol. Psychol. 3:1991;159-194.
5. Warwick-Evans L.A., Beaumont S. An experimental evaluation of sensory conflict versus postural control theories of motion sickness. Ecol. Psychol. 7:1991;163-179.