Microphase separation and modulated phases in a Coulomb frustrated Ising ferromagnet

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 423-428

  Viot, P ^a   Tarjus, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032533114     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i1998-00489-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. LEIBLER L., Macromolecules, 13 (1980) 1602; OHTA T. and KAWAZAKI K., Macromolecules, 19 (1986) 2621; FREDRICKSON G. H. and HELFAND E., J. Chem. Phys., 87 (1987) 697.
2. LEIBLER L., Macromolecules, 13 (1980) 1602; OHTA T. and KAWAZAKI K., Macromolecules, 19 (1986) 2621; FREDRICKSON G. H. and HELFAND E., J. Chem. Phys., 87 (1987) 697.
3. LEIBLER L., Macromolecules, 13 (1980) 1602; OHTA T. and KAWAZAKI K., Macromolecules, 19 (1986) 2621; FREDRICKSON G. H. and HELFAND E., J. Chem. Phys., 87 (1987) 697.
4. BATES F. S. and FREDRICKSON G. H., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 41 (1990) 525; MATSEN M. W. and BATES F. S., Macromolecules, 29 (1996) 1091.
5. BATES F. S. and FREDRICKSON G. H., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 41 (1990) 525; MATSEN M. W. and BATES F. S., Macromolecules, 29 (1996) 1091.
6. FRIED H. and BINDER K., J. Chem. Phys., 94 (1991) 8349; SCHULZ M. and BINDER K., J. Chem. Phys., 98 (1993) 655.
7. FRIED H. and BINDER K., J. Chem. Phys., 94 (1991) 8349; SCHULZ M. and BINDER K., J. Chem. Phys., 98 (1993) 655.
8. WU D., CHANDLER D. and SMIT B., J. Phys. Chem., 96 (1992) 4077; DEEM M. W. and CHANDLER D., Phys. Rev. E, 49 (1994) 4268.
9. WU D., CHANDLER D. and SMIT B., J. Phys. Chem., 96 (1992) 4077; DEEM M. W. and CHANDLER D., Phys. Rev. E, 49 (1994) 4268.
10. CARRARO C., Physica A, 236 (1997) 130.
11. KIVELSON D., KIVELSON S. A., ZHAO X., NUSSINOV Z. and TARJUS G., Physica A, 219 (1995) 27.
12. EMERY V. J. and KIVELSON S. A., Physica C, 209 (1993) 597.
13. SWIFT J. and HOHENBERG P. C., Phys. Rev. A, 15 (1977) 319; ROLAND C. and DESAI R., Phys. Rev. B, 42 (1990) 6648; ELDER K. R., VIÑALS J. and GRANT M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68 (1992) 3024; GLOTZER S., STAUFFER D. and JAN N., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72 (1994) 4109.
14. SWIFT J. and HOHENBERG P. C., Phys. Rev. A, 15 (1977) 319; ROLAND C. and DESAI R., Phys. Rev. B, 42 (1990) 6648; ELDER K. R., VIÑALS J. and GRANT M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68 (1992) 3024; GLOTZER S., STAUFFER D. and JAN N., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72 (1994) 4109.
15. SWIFT J. and HOHENBERG P. C., Phys. Rev. A, 15 (1977) 319; ROLAND C. and DESAI R., Phys. Rev. B, 42 (1990) 6648; ELDER K. R., VIÑALS J. and GRANT M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68 (1992) 3024; GLOTZER S., STAUFFER D. and JAN N., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72 (1994) 4109.
16. SWIFT J. and HOHENBERG P. C., Phys. Rev. A, 15 (1977) 319; ROLAND C. and DESAI R., Phys. Rev. B, 42 (1990) 6648; ELDER K. R., VIÑALS J. and GRANT M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68 (1992) 3024; GLOTZER S., STAUFFER D. and JAN N., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72 (1994) 4109.
17. GROUSSON M., VIOT P. and TARJUS G., in preparation.
18. CHAYES L., EMERY V. J., KIVELSON S. A., NUSSINOV Z. and TARJUS G., Physica A, 225 (1996) 129; NUSSINOV Z., RUDNICK J., KIVELSON S. A. and CHAYES L., preprint.
19. CHAYES L., EMERY V. J., KIVELSON S. A., NUSSINOV Z. and TARJUS G., Physica A, 225 (1996) 129; NUSSINOV Z., RUDNICK J., KIVELSON S. A. and CHAYES L., preprint.
20. BRAZOVSKII S. A., Sov. Phys. JETP, 41 (1975) 85.
21. MUKAMEL D. and HORNREICH R. M., J. Phys. C, 13 (1980) 161; LING D., FRIMAN B. and GRINSTEIN G., Phys. Rev. B, 24 (1981) 2718.
22. MUKAMEL D. and HORNREICH R. M., J. Phys. C, 13 (1980) 161; LING D., FRIMAN B. and GRINSTEIN G., Phys. Rev. B, 24 (1981) 2718.
23. LÖW U., EMERY V. J., FABRICIUS K. and KIVELSON S. A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72 (1994) 1918.
24. MACISAAC A. B., WHITEHEAD J. P., ROBINSON M. C. and DF'BELL K., Phys. Rev. B, 51 (1995) 16033.
25. KRETSCHMER R. and BINDER K., Z. Phys. B, 34 (1979) 375. The effect of the dipolar interaction is less drastic than that of the Coulombic interaction studied here since complete ferromagnetic ordering is not prevented and the order of the transition is unchanged.
26. SELKE W., Phys. Rep., 170 (1988) 213. Note that a major difference with the ANNNI model is that complete ferromagnetic order is forbidden for all nonzero values of the frustration parameter Q, so that the Coulomb frustrated Ising model does not have an ordinary Lifshitz point. In addition, the T = 0 phase diagram already displays a rich variety of modulated phases.