Effect of presence of a dominant follicle on the superovulatory response in Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

Theriogenology

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 841-852

  Manik, R S ^a   Singla, S K ^a   Palta, P ^a   Madan, M L ^b  

^a NATIONAL DAIRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Buffalo; Dominant follicle; Superovulation; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

FOLLITROPIN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BUFFALO; CORPUS LUTEUM; ECHOGRAPHY; ESTRUS CYCLE; FEMALE; FOLLITROPIN BLOOD LEVEL; HISTOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OVARY; OVARY FOLLICLE; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUPEROVULATION;

ANIMALS; BUFFALOES; CORPUS LUTEUM; FEMALE; FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE; OVARIAN FOLLICLE; OVARY; SUPEROVULATION;

EID: 0032532710     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00189-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1. Baruselli PS, Mucciolo RG, Visintin JA, Viana WG, Arruda RP, Madureira EH, Oliveira CA, Molero-Filho JR. Ovarian follicular dynamics during the estrous cycle in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology 1997;47:1531-1547.
2. 2. Bungartz L, Niemann H. Assessment of the presence of a dominant follicle and selection of dairy cows suitable for superovulation by a single ultrasound examination. J Reprod Fertil 1993;101:583-591.
3. 3. Ginther OJ, Kastelic JP, Knopf L. Composition and characteristics of follicular waves during the bovine estrus cycle. Anim Reprod Sci 1989;20:187-200.
4. 4. Goulding D, Williams DH, Dufry O, Boland MP, Roche JF. Superovulation in heifers given FSH initiated either at Day 2 or Day 10 of the estrous cycle. Theriogenology 1990;34:767-778.
5. 5. Grasso F, Guitbault LA, Roy GL, Lussier JG. Ultrasonographic determination of ovarian follicular development in superovulated heifers pretreated with FSH-P at the beginning of the estrous cycle. Theriogenology 1989;31:1209-1219.
6. 6. Gray BW, Cartee RE, Stringfellow DA, Riddell MG, Riddell KP, Wright JC. The effects of FSH-priming and dominant follicular regression on the superovulatory response of cattle. Theriogenology 1992;37:631-639.
7. 7. Guilbault, LA, Grasso F, Lussier JG, Rouillier P, Matton P. Decreased superovulatory responses in heifers superovulated in the presence of a dominant follicle. J Reprod Fertil 1991;91:81-89.
8. 8. Huhtinen M, Rainio V, Aalto J, Bredbacka P, Maki-Tanilla A. Increased ovarian responses in the absence of a dominant follicle in superovulated cows. Theriogenology 1992;37:457-463.
9. 2α during the first wave of follicular development. Theriogenology 1990;33:270 abstr.
10. 10. Lerner SP, Thayne WV, Baker RD, Henschen T, Meredith S, Inskeep EK, Dailey RA, Lewis PE, Butcher RL. Age, dose of FSH and other factors affecting superovulation in Holstein cows. J Anim Sci 1986;63:176-183.
11. 11. Madan ML, Das SK, Palta P. Application of reproductive technology to buffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 1996;42:299-306.
12. 12. Manik RS, Ambrose JD, Singla SK, Chauhan MS, Madan ML. Real time ultrasound evaluation of follicular changes in superovulated Murrah buffaloes. Buffalo J 1994;10:139-146.
13. 13. Manik RS, Madan ML, Singla SK. Ovarian follicular dynamics in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis): Ultrasonically monitoring individual follicles for wave hypothesis. Theriogenology 1994;41:246 abstr.
14. 14. Mapletoft RJ, Pierson RA. Factors affecting superovulation in the cow: practical considerations. IETS Embryo Transfer Newsl 1993;11:15-24.
15. 15. Monniaux D, Chupin D, Saumande J. Superovulatory responses of cattle. Theriogenology 1983;19:55-81.
16. 16. Murphy BD, Mapletoft RJ, Manns J. Variability in gonadotrophin preparations as a factor in superovulatory response. Theriogenology 1984;21:117-125.
17. 17. Purwantara B, Schmidt M, Greve T, Callesen H. Follicular dynamics prior to and during superovulation in heifers. Theriogenology 1993;40:913-921.
18. 18. Romero A, Albert J, Brink Z, Seidel GE. Numbers of small follicles in ovaries affect superovulation response in cattle. Theriogenology 1991;35:265 abstr.
19. 19. Rouiller P, Matton P, Guilbault L, Grasso F, Lussier J. Influence of a dominant follicle atresia and estradiol release by ovarian follicles during superovulation in cattle. Theriogenology 1990;33:313 abstr.
20. 20. Staigmiller RB, MacNeil MD, Bellows RA, Short RE, Phelps DA. The effect of estrus synchronization scheme, injection protocol and large ovarian follicle on response to superovulation in beef heifers. Theriogenology 1995;43:823-834.
21. 21. Sunderland SJ, Crowe MA, Boland MP, Roche JF, Ireland JJ. Selection, dominance and atresia of follicles during the oestrous cycle of heifers. J Reprod Fertil 1994;101:547-555.
22. 22. Taneja M, Singh G, Totey SM, Ali A. Follicular dynamics in water buffalo superovulated in presence or absence of a dominant follicle. Theriogenology 1995;44:581-597.
23. 23. Wilson JM, Jones AL, Miller DR. Influence of a dominant follicle on the superovulatory response. Theriogenology 1990;33:349 abstr.