Mammographic findings and family history risk for breast cancer in American Indian women

Cancer

Volumn 83, Issue 8 SUPPL., 1998, Pages 1830-1832

  Roubidoux, Marilyn A ^a,b   Kaur, Judith Salmon ^c   Giroux, Jennifer ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d Meritcare Health System   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast malignancies; Mammography; North American Indians; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMERICAN INDIAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CONFERENCE PAPER; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 0032531798     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981015)83:8+<1830::aid-cncr32>3.0.co;2-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Burhansstipanov L, Tenney M, Russell S, Wound DB, Plomer L. Overview of the Native American Cancer Conference III: risk factors, outreach and intervention strategies. Cancer 1996;78:1527-32.
2. Department of Health and Human Services, PHS, NIH, NCI. Report of the Special Action Committee, 1992: program initiatives related to minorities, the underserved and persons aged 65 and over. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1992.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, IHS. Report of the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Legislation, Division of Program Statistics: regional differences in Indian health. Part IV. Rockville, MD: Government Printing Office, 1996:43-90.
4. Nutting PA, Calonge BN, Iverson DC, Green L. The danger of applying uniform clinical policies across populations: the case of breast cancer in American Indians. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1631-6.
5. Caines JS, Chantziantoniou K, Wright BA, et al. Nova Scotia breast screening program experience: use of needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of screening-detected abnormalities. Radiology 1996;198:125-30.
6. Sickles EA. Quality assurance: how to audit your mammography practice. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:265-75.
7. Welty TK, Zephier N, Schweigman K, Blake B, Leonardson G. Cancer risk factors in three Sioux tribes. Cancer in Indian country: a national conference: proceedings of the Second National Conference on Cancer in Native Americans. Alaska Med 1993;35(4):265-72.
8. Vogel VG, Bondy M, Halabi S, Lord J, Laville EA. The Texas breast screening project: part II. Demographics, risk profiles, and health practices of participants. South Med J 1993; 86:391-6.
9. Black WC, Nease RF Jr., Tosteson ANA. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:720-31.
10. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1622-9.
11. Hart BL, Steinbock RT, Mettler FA, Pathak DR, Bartow SA. Age and race related changes in mammographic parenchymal patterns. Cancer 1989;63:2537-9.
12. Warren Burhenne LJ, Burhenne HJ, Kan L. Quality-oriented mass mammography screening. Radiology 1995; 194:185-8.
13. Burhenne HJ, Warren Burhenne L, Goldberg F, et al. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification. AJR 1994;31: 187-210.