Specific projections of sympathetic preganglionic neurons are not intrinsically determined by segmental origins of their cell bodies

Journal of Neurobiology

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 371-378

  Yip, Joseph W ^a   Yip, Yee Ping L ^a   Capriotti, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Axon guidance; Chick embryo; Neural tube transplantation; Specification

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICK EMBRYO; EMBRYO; NERVE FIBER GROWTH; NERVE PROJECTION; NEURAL TUBE; NONHUMAN; PREGANGLIONIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD; SYMPATHETIC NERVE; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CHICK EMBRYO; FETAL TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION; GANGLIA, SYMPATHETIC; NEURONS; ROTATION; SPINAL CORD; SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 0032525825     PISSN: 00223034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19980615)35:4<371::AID-NEU4>3.0.CO;2-W     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. CORNBROOKS, B. E., NEWTON, C. J., and FOREHAND, C. J. (1997). Development of differential preganglionic projections to pre- and paravertebral sympathetic ganglia. J. Comp. Neurol. 382:1-18.
2. FOREHAND, C. J., EZERMAN, E. B., RUBIN, E., and GLOVER, J. C. (1994). Segmental patterning of rat and chicken sympathetic preganglionic neurons: correlation between somaposition and axon projection pathway. J. Neurosci. 14:231-241.
3. HAMBURGER, V. and HAMILTON, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88:49-52.
4. LANCE-JONES, C. and LANDMESSER, L. (1980). Motoneurone projection patterns in the chick hind limb following early partial reversals of the spinal cord. J. Physiol. Lond. 302:581-602.
5. LANGLEY, J. N. (1895). Note on regeneration of preganglionic fibres of the sympathetic. J. Physiol. Lond. 18:280-284.
6. MATISE, M. P. and LANCE-JONES, C. (1996). A critical period for the specification of motor pools in the chick lumbosacral spinal cord. Development 122:659-669.
7. MIRNICS, K. and KOERBER, H. R. (1995). Prenatal development of rat primary afferent fibers: I. Peripheral projections. J. Comp. Neurol. 355:589-600.
8. NJÅ, A. and PURVES, D. (1978). Specificity of initial synaptic contacts on guinea-pig superior cervical ganglion cells during regeneration of the cervical sympathetic trunk. J. Physiol. Lond. 281:45-62.
9. PRASAD, A. and HOLLYDAY, M. (1991). Development and migration of avian sympathetic preganglionic neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 307:237-258.
10. SCOTT, S. A. (1986). Skin sensory innervation patterns in embryonic chick hindlimbs following dorsal root ganglion reversals. J. Neurobiol. 17:649-668.
11. TERNI, T. (1924). Ricerche anatomiche sul sistema nervoso autonomo degli Ucelli. Arch. Ital. Embriol. 20:433-510.
12. TSUCHIDA, T., ENSINI, M., MORTON, S. B., BALDASSARE, M., EDLUND, T., JESSELL, T. M., and PLAFF, S. L. (1994). Topographic organization of embryonic motor neurons defined by expression of LIM homeobox genes. Cell 79:957-970.
13. WANG, G. Y. and SCOTT, S. A. (1997a). Muscle sensory innervation patterns in embryonic chick hindlimbs following dorsal root ganglion reversal. Dev. Biol. 186:27-35.
14. WANG, G. Y. and SCOTT, S. A. (1997b). Independent development of sensory and motor innervation patterns in embryonic chick hindlimbs. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 23:30.
15. WENGER, B. S. (1968). Construction and use of the vibrating needle for embryonic operations. Bioscience 18:226-228.
16. YIP, J. W. (1987). Target cues are not required for the guidance of sympathetic preganglionic axons. Dev. Brain Res. 32:155-159.
17. YIP, J. W. (1990). Identification of location and timing of guidance cues in sympathetic preganglionic axons of the chick. J. Neurosci. 10:2476-2484.
18. YIP, J. W. (1993). Segmental specificity of sympathetic preganglionic projections is influenced by preganglionic axons from neighboring segments. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 19:235.
19. YIP, J. W. (1996). Specificity of sympathetic preganglionic projections in the chick is influenced by the somitic mesoderm. J. Neurosci. 16:612-620.