Solution of the groundwater transport management problem by sequential relaxation

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 591-604

  Ahlfeld, David P ^b   Zafirakou, Antigoni ^a,b   Riefler, R Guy ^b  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; FLOW CONTROL; HEURISTIC METHODS; ITERATIVE METHODS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RELAXATION PROCESSES;

GROUNDWATER TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT; HEAD DIFFERENCE CONSTRAINT VALUES; LINEAR HYDRAULIC CONTROL; SEQUENTIAL RELAXATION;

GROUNDWATER FLOW;

GROUNDWATER; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; REMEDIATION;

GROUNDWATER; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; REMEDIATION;

EID: 0032525703     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1708(97)00021-3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. 1. Gorelick, S.M. A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resources Research, 1993, 19(2).
2. 2. Willis, R. and Yeh, W. W.-G., Groundwater Systems Planning and Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1987.
3. 3. Ahlfeld, D.P. and Heidari, M. Applications of optimal hydraulic control to ground-water systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1994, 120, 350-365.
4. 4. Ahlfeld, D.P., Pinder, G.F. and Mulvey, J.M. Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory 2. Analysis of a field site. Water Resources Research, 1988, 24(3).
5. 5. Culver, T.B. and Shoemaker, C.A. Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(3), 629-641.
6. 6. Atwood, D.F. and Gorelick, S.M. Hydraulic gradient control for groundwater contaminant removal. Journal of Hydrology, 1985, 76, 85-106.
7. 7. Datta, B. and Peralta, R.C. Optimal modification of regional potentiometric surface design for groundwater contaminant containment, Transactions of the Amer. Soc. of Agric. Engrs., 1986, 29(6), 1611-1622.
8. 8. Luenberger, D. G., Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984.
9. 9. Ahlfeld, D.P., Page, R.H. and Pinder, G.F. Optimal groundwater remediation methods applied to a superfund site: from formulation to implementation. Groundwater, 1995, 33,
10. 10. McDonald, M. G. and Harbaugh, A. W., A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Techniques of Water-resources. Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, U.S. Geological Survey, 1988.
11. 11. Zheng, A. C., A Modular Three-dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemi cal Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems. S.S Papadopulos and Assoc., Inc., Bethesda, MD, 1992.
12. 12. Rogers, L.L. and Dowla, F.U. Optimization of ground water remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling. Water Resources Research, 1994, 30(2), 457-481.
13. 13. Marryott, R.A., Dougherty, D.E. and Stollar, R.L. Optimal groundwater management 2. Application of simulated annealing to a field-scale contamination site. Water Resources Research, 1993, 29(4).