Eastern cottonwood clonal mixing study: Intergenotypic competition effects

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 112, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 9-22

  Foster, G S ^a   Rousseau, R J ^b   Nance, W L ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b Westvaco Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic deployment; Genetic variance; Growth and yield modeling; Overyielding; Underyielding

Indexed keywords

CLONAL MIXING; CLONE; DIALLEL ANALYSIS; GENOTYPIC VARIATION; INTERGENOTYPIC COMPETITION; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GROWTH;

POPULUS DELTOIDES;

EID: 0032517804     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00302-8     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, W.T., 1980. Intergenotypic competition in forest trees. In: Dancik, B.P., Higginbotham, K.O. (Eds.), Proc. 6th North American Forest Biology Workshop. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 1-14.
2. Adams W.T., Roberds J.H., Zobel B.J. Intergenotypic interactions among families of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 43:1973;319-322.
3. Cao Q.V., Durand K.M. A growth and yield model for improved eastern cottonwood plantations in the lower Mississippi delta. South. J. Appl. For. 15:1991;213-216.
4. Clutter, J.L., Fortson, J.C., Pienaar, L.V., Brister, G.F., Bailey, R.L., 1983. Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. Wiley, New York, 333 pp.
5. DeBell D.S., Harrington C.A. Deploying genotypes in short-rotation plantations: mixtures and pure cultures of clones and species. For. Chron. 69:1993;705-713.
6. Foster G.S. Trends in genetic parameters with stand development and their influence on early selection for volume growth in loblolly pine. For. Sci. 32:1986;944-959.
7. Foster, G.S., Knowe, S.A., 1995. Deployment and genetic gains. In: Potts, B.M., Borralho, N.M.G., Reid, J.B., Cromer, R.N., Tibbits, W.N., Raymond, C.A. (Eds.), Eucalypt Plantations: Improving Fibre Yield and Quality. Proc. CRCTHF-IUFRO Conf. 19-24 February, at Hobart, Australia, pp. 469-478.
8. Franklin E.C. Model relating levels of genetic variance to stand development of four North American conifers. Silv. Genet. 28:1979;207-212.
9. Harper, J.L., 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York, 892 pp.
10. Hart, J.D., 1986. Intergenotypic competition among several families of loblolly pine. Ph.D. Dissertation, Deptartment of Forestry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 60 pp.
11. Hill J. Methods of analysing competition with special reference to herbage plants. III. Monocultures v. binary mixtures. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 83:1974;57-65.
12. Hill J., Shimamoto Y. Methods of analysing competition with special reference to herbage plants. I. establishment. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 81:1973;77-89.
13. Hinson K., Hanson W.D. Competition studies in soybeans. Crop Sci. 1:1961;117-123.
14. Johnstone, R.C.B., Samuel, C.J.A., 1974. Experimental design for forest tree progeny tests with particular reference to plot size and shape. Proc. Joint International Union of Forest Research Organizations Meeting. S.02.04.1-3. Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 357-376.
15. Knowe S.A., Foster G.S., Rousseau R., Nance W. Eastern cottonwood clonal mixing study: predicted diameter distributions. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1993;405-414.
16. Lundkvist K., Eriksson G., Norell L. Performance of clonal mixtures and single-clone plots in young Picea abies trials. Scand. J. For. Res. 7:1992;53-62.
17. Magnussen S. Effects and adjustments of competition bias in progeny trials with single-tree plots. For. Sci. 35:1989;532-547.
18. Markovic, J., Herpka, I., 1986. Plantations in short rotations. In: Guzina, V. (Ed.), Poplars and Willows in Yugoslavia. Poplar Research Institute, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, pp. 182-197.
19. McKnight, J.S., 1970. Planting cottonwood cuttings for timber production in the South. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper SO-60, Southern For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, Louisiana. 17 pp.
20. Mohn, C.S., Krinard, R.M., 1971. Volume tables for small cottonwoods in plantations. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note SO-113, Southern For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, Louisiana, 4 pp.
21. Nance, W.L., 1983. Simulated growth and yield of single family versus multi-family loblolly pine plantations. In: Jones, E.P. (Ed.), Proc. 2nd Biennial Southern Silviculture Research Conf. 4-5 November 1982. Atlanta, Georgia. USDA For. Serv. General Technical Report SE-24, Southeastern For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, North Carolina, pp. 446-453.
22. Nance, W.L., Land, Jr., S.B., Daniels, R.F., 1983. Concepts for analysis of intergenotypic competition in forest trees. Proc. 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conf. 6-9 June 1983, at University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, pp. 131-145.
23. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., 1974. Applied linear statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, USA, 842 pp.
24. Rockwood, D.L., 1983. Alternative designs for progeny testing slash pine. Proc. 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conf. 6-9 June 1983, at University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, pp. 179-185.
25. Sakai K.-I. Competitive ability in plants: its inheritance and some related problems. Symp. Society Exp. Biol. 15:1961;245-263.
26. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 481 pp.
27. Tauer C.G. Competition between selected black cottonwood genotypes. Silv. Genet. 24:1975;44-49.
28. Trenbath B.R. Biomass productivity of mixtures. Adv. Agron. 26:1974;177-210.
29. Tuskan G.A., van Buijtenen J.P. Inherent differences in family response to inter-family competition in loblolly pine. Silv. Genet. 35:1986;112-118.
30. von Euler, F., 1993. Plot design effects on phenotypic variability and dynamics of field competition between six Pinus sylvestris L. varieties. Scand. J. For. Res. vol. 8, in press.
31. von Euler F., Baradat P., Lemoine B. Effects of plantation density and spacing competitive interactions among half-sib families of maritime pine. Can. J. For. Res. 22:1992;482-489.
32. von Euler, F., Ekberg, I., Eriksson, G., 1993. Pairwise competition among progenies derived from matings within and between three origins of Picea abies (L.) Karst., in a close-spaced nursery trial. In: von Euler, F. (Ed.), Competition in the Progeny Testing of Forest Trees. Department of Forest Genetics. Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Uppsala, Sweden, Research Notes 48. pp. 1-13.
33. Williams, C.G., Bridgwater, F.E., Lambeth, C.C., 1983. Performance of single family versus mixed family plantation blocks of loblolly pine. Proc. 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. 6-9 June 1983, at University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, pp. 194-202.
34. Wright A.J. Some implications of a first-order model of inter-plant competition for the means and variances of complex mixtures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 64:1982;91-96.