Effect of familiarity with the environment on the behaviour and performance response of sows and piglets to grouping during lactation

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 25-39

  Wattanakul, W ^a,b   Edwards, S A ^a   Stewart, A H ^a   English, P R ^b  

^a SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Maternal filial bond; Multisuckling; Pen design; Pig; Suckling behaviour

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032517799     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00166-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andersson, C., Andréasson, E., 1992. Group housed lactating sows in small groups: Duration rhythm, social interactions and suckling and nursing behaviour. Examensarbete 41. Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala.
2. Arey D.S. The family system for pigs: developments at Aberdeen. Fm. Bldg. Progr. 116:1994;8-12.
3. Beattie, V.E., Sneddon, I.A., Walker, N., 1993. Behaviour and productivity of the domestic pig in barren and enriched environments. In: Livestock Environment IV. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 43-50.
4. Braun, S., 1995. Individual variation in behaviour and growth of piglets in a combined system of individual and loose housing in sows. Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara.
5. Bryant M.J., Rowlinson P. Nursing and suckling behaviour of sows and their litters before and after grouping in multi-accommodation pens. Anim. Prod. 38:1984;277-282.
6. Chapple R.P., Cuaron J.A., Easter R.A. Effect of glucocorticoids and limiting nursing on the carbohydrate digestive capacity and growth rate of piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 67:1989;2956-2973.
7. Close, W.H., 1981. The influence of the thermal environment on the productivity of pigs. In: Smith, A.T., Lawrence, T.L.J. (Eds.), Pig Housing and the Environment. Occasional Publication No. 11. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., 9-24.
8. Ebner, J., 1993. Group-housing of lactating sows: studies on health, behaviour and nest temperature. Thesis. Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Skara.
9. Fraser D. A review of the behavioural mechanisms of milk ejection of the domestic pig. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 6:1980;247-255.
10. Hatet G., Edwards S.A., Gall K., Arey D.S. Effect of three lactation housing systems on sow and piglet performance and behaviour. Anim. Prod. 58:1994;475.
11. Horrell I., Hodgson J. The bases of sow-piglet identification: 2. Cues used by piglets to identify their dam and home pen. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33:1992;329-343.
12. Jensen P. Observations on the maternal behaviour of free ranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16:1986;131-142.
13. Jensen P., Redbo I. Behaviour during nest leaving in free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 18:1987;355-362.
14. Minitab, 1993. Minitab software (Release 9). Minitab, USA.
15. Newberry R.C., Wood-Gush D.G.M. Social relationships of piglets in a semi-natural environment. Anim. Behav. 34:1986;1311-1318.
16. Olsson, A.C., Svendsen, J., 1995. Mixing of sows and piglets: problems and routines. Report 96. Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Lund.
17. Rantzer D., Svendsen J., Weström B. Weaning of pigs raised in sow-controlled and in conventional housing systems: 2. Behaviour studies and cortisol levels. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 25:1995;61-71.
18. Rushen J., Ladewig J., de Passillé A.M.B. A novel environment inhibits milk ejection in the pig but not through HPA activity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 45:1995;53-61.
19. Thompson L.H., Hanford K.J., Jensen A.H. Estrus and fertility in lactating sows and piglets performance as influenced by limited nursing. J. Anim. Sci. 53:1981;1419-1423.
20. Wattanakul W., Stewart A.H., Edwards S.A., English P.R. Performance and behaviour of lactating sows and piglets in crate and multisuckling systems; a study involving European White and Manor Meishan genotypes. Anim. Sci. 64:1997;339-349.
21. Wattanakul W., Stewart A.H., Edwards S.A., English P.R. A study of the effects of grouping piglets and changing sow location on behaviour and performance of suckling piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 55:1997;21-35.
22. Wattanakul W., Stewart A.H., Edwards S.A., English P.R. The effect of cross suckling and presence of additional piglets on suckling behaviour and performance in individually confined sows. Anim. Sci. 66:1998;449-455.
23. Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., Thompson B.K., Fraser D. Risky behaviour by piglets: a trade-off between feeding and risk of mortality by maternal crushing. Anim. Behav. 51:1996;619-624.
24. Wiegand R.M., Gonyou H.W., Curtis S.E. Pen shape and size: effects on pig behavior and performance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39:1994;49-61.
25. Wülbers-Mindermann, M., 1992. Characteristics of cross-suckling piglets reared in a group housing system. Specialarbete 13. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara.