Could boxing be banned? A legal and epidemiological perspective

BMJ

Volumn 316, Issue 7147, 1998, Pages 1813-

  Brayne, Hugh ^a   Sargeant, Lincoln ^b   Brayne, Carol ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOXING; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; LEGAL ASPECT; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SPORT INJURY; VIOLENCE;

BOXING; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; VIOLENCE;

EID: 0032513923     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1813     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dillner L. Boxing should be counted out, says BMA report. BMJ 1993; 306: 1561-1562.
2. R v R [1992] AC 599.
3. Bland v Airedale Health Trust [1993] 1 FLR 1026.
4. Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act. London: HMSO, 1985.
5. A & B v UK [1996] FCR 569.
6. R v Brown and others [1993] 2 All ER 116.
7. Grayson E. Sport and the law, 2nd ed. London: Butterworth, 1994.
8. R v Lloyd (1989) Cr App R 36.
9. R v Marsh (1994) Crim LR 52.
10. McCord v Swansea City AFC Ltd. Times 1997 Feb 11.
11. Law Commission consultation paper 139 (1995) para 12.34.
12. Law Commission consultation paper 134 (1994).
13. Law Commission consultation paper 139 (1995).
14. Gunn M Ormerod D. The legality of boxing. Legal Studies 1995; 15: 181.
15. R v Coney (1892) 8 QBD 534.
16. Attorney-General's Reference (no 6) of 1980 [1981] 1 QB 71.
17. R v Brown and others [1993] 2 All ER 116.
18. An appeal to the European Court of Human Rights based on the right to privacy failed—Lasky and others v UK. Times 1997 Feb 20.
19. Pallante v Stadiums Pty Ltd (no 1) [1976] VR 33.
20. Law Commission consultation paper 134 (1994) para 2.9.
21. Smoldon v Whitworth. Times 1996 April 23.