Medicinsk teknologivurdering i Europa

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 160, Issue 16, 1998, Pages 2367-2370

  Jørgensen, Torben ^b   Kristensen, Finn Borlum ^a  

^a Statens Inst Medicinsk T   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DENMARK; EUROPE; HUMAN;

DENMARK; EUROPE; HUMANS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 0032513449     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andreasen PB. Medicinsk teknologivurdering. Nyttiggørelse af læ gevidenskabelige forskningsresultater i sundhedsvæsenet Rapport til Folketingets udvalg angående videnskabelig forskning. Afgivet 9, April 1980.
2. Jørgensen T. Teknologivurdering. København. Dansk Sygehus Institut. 1980, (DSI Specialrapport 80-07).
3. Sundhedsstyrelsen, Udvalget for Medicinsk Teknologivurdering. National strategi for medicinsk teknologivurdering. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 1996.
4. Banta HD, Luce BR. Health care technology and its assessment. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
5. Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine at the policy level. I: Kristensen FB, Sigmund H eds. Evidensbaseret sundhedsvæsen. København: DSI-Institut for Sundhedsvaesen 1997: 3043. (DSI-rapport 97.02).
6. Thorup MZ, Markenvard JD, Hansen A. Forskelsbehandling af mænd og kvinder i anvendelse af trombolyse ved akut myokardieinfarkt. Ugeskr Læger 1995; 157: 2299-302.
7. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Medicinsk fødsels- og misdannelsesstatistik 1994 og 1995. Sundhedsstatistikken 1997: 6. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 1997.
8. Report from the EUR-ASSESS Project. Special Section. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997; 13: 133-333.
9. Oortwijn WJ, Ament AJHA, Vonderling H. Use of societal criteria in evaluation of medical technology assessment research proposals in the Netherlands: development and testing of a checklist. Z Gesundheitswiss 1996; 4 (5-19).
10. Sigmund H. Data-sheets as a tool for selecting relevant topics for medical technology assessment. Proceedings from ISTAHC Twelfth Annual Meeting. Montreal: International Society of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996.
11. Donaldson MS, Sox HC, eds. Setting priorities for health technology assessment: A model process. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1992.
12. Perry S, Gardner E, Thamer M. The status of health technology assessment worldwide, results of an international survey. In J Technol Assess Health Care 1997; 13: 81-98.
13. Wiktorowicz M, Deber R Regulating biotechnology: a rational-political model of policy development. Health Policy 1997; 40: 115-38.
14. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, Mulley AG, Henderson JV, Wennberg JE. Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med Care 1995; 33: 771-82.
15. Schulper M, Drummond M, Buxton M. The iterative use of economic evaluation as part of the process of health technology assessment. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997; 2: 26-30.
16. Jørgensen T. Consensus conferences of the health care sector. I: Joss S, Durant J, eds. Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum, 1995.
17. Banta HD. Coordination of health technology assessment in Europe Eurohealth 1996; 2, nr 4: 11-3.
18. Kristensen FB. Implementering af veldokumenteret viden i sundhedsvæsenets praksis. I: Kristensen FB, Sigmund H, eds. Evidens-baseret sundhedsvæsen. København: DSI · Institut for Sundhedsvæsen, 1997: 53-63 (DSI-rapport 97.02).