Enantioselective catalysis. Part 119: New chiral 2-(2- pyridinyl)oxazoline ligands containing an additional optically active substituent in the pyridine system

Tetrahedron Asymmetry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 407-422

  Brunner, Henri ^a   Störiko, Reinhard ^a   Nuber, Bernhard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 (2 PYRIDINYL)OXAZOLINE; OXAZOLINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CATALYSIS; CHIRALITY; DRUG SYNTHESIS; ENANTIOMER; LIGAND BINDING; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL ROTATION; PRECURSOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

EID: 0032512603     PISSN: 09574166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4166(97)00619-8     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. 1. Part 118: H. Brunner, R. Störiko, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., in press.
2. 2. H. Brunner, H. Nishiyama, K. Itoh, Asymmetric Hydrosilylation in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis (Ed.: I. Ojima), VCH Publishers, New York 1993, 303-322 and references therein.
3. 3. H. Brunner, Transition Metal Catalyzed Reactions in Houben-Weyl, Vol. E 21d, Stereoselective Synthesis (Eds.: G. Helmchen, R. W. Hoffmann, J. Mulzer, E. Schaumann), Thieme, Stuttgart, New York 1995, 4074-4081 and references therein.
4. 4. H. Brunner, W. Zettlmeier, Handbook of Enantioselective Catalysis, Vol. I & II, VCH, Weinheim 1993.
5. 5. H. Nishiyama, H. Sakaguchi, T. Nakamura, M. Horihata, M. Kondo, K. Itoh, Organometallics 1989, 8, 846-848.
6. 6. H. Nishiyama, M. Kondo, T. Nakamura, K. Itoh, Organometallics 1991, 10, 500-508.
7. 7. H. Nishiyama, S. Yamaguchi, S.-B. Park, K. Itoh, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 143-150.
8. 8. D. A. Evans, K. A. Woerpel, M. M. Hinman, M. M. Faul, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 726-728.
9. 9. C. Bolm, K. Weickhardt, M. Zehnder, T. Ranff, Chem. Ber. 1991, 124, 1173-1180.
10. 10. Review: T. G. Gant, A. I. Meyers, Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2297-2360.
11. 11. Review: F. Kröhnke, Synthesis 1976, 1-24.
12. 12. G. Chelucci, G. A. Pinna, A. Saba, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2571-2578 and references therein.
13. 13. S. Hünig, J. Groß, W. Schenk, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1973, 324-338.
14. 14. P. Hayoz, A. von Zelewsky, H. Stoeckli-Evans, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5111-5114.
15. 15. W. Zecher, F. Kröhnke, Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 690-697.
16. 16. Since (+)-pinocarvone was prepared from (-)-α-pinene (ca. 80% ee) 10% of the other enantiomer was present. Hence, after synthesis of the chiral oxazoline 9 there might be a mixture of diastereomers.
17. 17. In this paper L-menthyl-represents [(1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl]-and D-menthyl-represents [(1S,2R,5S)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl]-.
18. 18. S. G. Hentges, K. B. Sharpless, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,102, 4263-4265.
19. 19. E. Macedo, C. Moberg, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 549-558.
20. 20. S. G. Hentges, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University 1980.
21. 21. T. Hayashi, M. Konishi, M. Kumada, Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 21, 1871-1874.
22. 22. H. W. Krause, A. Kinting, J. Prakt. Chem. 1980, 322, 485-486.
23. 23. See e.g. H. Brunner, M. Janura, Synthesis, submitted.
24. 24. T. W. Bell, L.-Y. Hu, S. V. Patel, J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 3847-3850.
25. 25. General procedure: W. K. Fife, J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1375-1377.
26. 26. General procedure: F. C. Schaefer, G. A. Peters, J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 412-418.
27. 27. K. Nordström, E. Macedo, C. Moberg, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1604-1609.
28. 28. H. Brunner, U. Obermann, Chem. Ber. 1989, 122, 499-507.
29. 29. P. Hayoz, A. von Zelewsky, Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 32, 5165-5168.
30. 30. We thank Prof. A. von Zelewsky, University of Fribourg (Switzerland) for providing this compound.
31. 31. H. Brunner, P. Brandl, J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 390, C81-C83.
32. 32. H. Brunner, P. Brandl, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2, 919-930.
33. 4 to improve the performance of Rh-catalysed asymmetric hydrosilylations has been reported (e.g. Refs. 6 and 7).
34. 34. E. D. Mihelich, D. J. Eickhoff, J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4135-4137.
35. 35. The CIP-nomenclature of related compounds (e.g. Ref. 12 and G. Chelucci, M. A. Cabras, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 965-966) is in error. The correct configuration of 3-9 at C-5 is R (C-4a/C-8a has priority with respect to C-9/C-7) and at C-7 also R (priority sequence: C-9>C-8/C-8a>C-6/C-5).
36. 36. J. G. Smith, G. F. Wright, J. Org. Chem. 1952, 17, 1116-1121.