Roaming through methodology;Dwalingen in de methodologie. VII. Reproduceerbaarheid van metingen

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 142, Issue 37, 1998, Pages 2040-2043

  De Vet, H C W ^a   Beurskens, A J H M ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH;

EID: 0032511572     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
2. Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992;304:1491-4.
3. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
4. Cohen J Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213-20.
5. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley, 1981.
6. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intra class correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-10.