Synthetic and kinetic aspects of nickel-catalysed amination of allylic alcohol derivatives

Tetrahedron

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 1073-1084

  Bricout, Hervé ^a   Carpentier, Jean François ^a   Mortreux, André ^a  

^a Lab de Chimie Organique Appliquee   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLYL ALCOHOL; ALLYLAMINE DERIVATIVE; DIETHYLAMINE;

AMINATION; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032510212     PISSN: 00404020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(97)10208-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. 1. Review articles: (a) Trost, B. M.; Verhoeven, T. R. in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry; G. Wilkinson, Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1982, pp 799-938.
2. (b) Heck, R. F. Palladium Reagents in Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: New York, 1985.
3. (c) Tsuji, J. Tetrahedron, 1986, 42, 4361-4401.
4. (d) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1173-1192.
5. (e) Frost, C. G.; Howarth, J.; Williams, J. M. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1992, 3, 1089-1122.
6. (f) Trost, B. M.; Van Vranken, D. L. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 395-422.
7. 2. (a) Atkins, K. E.; Walker, W. E.; Manyik, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 43, 3821-3824.
8. (b) Takahashi, K.; Miyake, A.; Hata, G. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 45, 230-236.
9. 3. Yamamoto, T.; Ishizu, J.; Yamamoto, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6863-6869.
10. 4. For leading references see: (a) Chuit, C.; Felkin, H.; Frajerman, C.; Roussi, G.; Swierczewski, G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1968, 1604-1605.
11. (b) Cherest, M.; Felkin, H.; Umpleby, J. D.; Davies, S. G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 681-682.
12. (c) Consiglio, G.; Morandini, F.; Piccolo, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 1846-1847.
13. (d) Consiglio, G.; Piccolo, O.; Roncetti, L.; Morandini, F. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 2043-2053.
14. (e) Kobayashi, Y.; Ikeda, E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1789-1790.
15. (f) Consiglio, G.; Waymouth, R. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 257-276.
16. 5. (a) Furukawa, J.; Kiji, J.; Yamamoto, K.; Tojo, T. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 3149-3151.
17. (b) Yamamoto, T.; Ishizu, J.; Yamamoto, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6863-6869.
18. (c) Cuvigny, T.; Julia, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983, 250, C21-C24.
19. (d) ibid, 1986, 317, 383-408.
20. (e) Alvarez, E.; Cuvigny, T.; Julia, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 339, 199-212.
21. 6. Bricout, H.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Mortreux, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1863-1864.
22. 7. Bricout, H.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Mortreux, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6105-6108.
23. 8. (a) Bricout, H.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Mortreux, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1053-1056.
24. (b) Nilsson, Y. I. M.; Andersson, P. G.; Bäckvall, J.-E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6609-6613.
25. 2 species.
26. 10. See for example: (a) Corain, B.; Puosi, G. J. Catal. 1973, 30, 403-408.
27. (b) Tamao, K.; Sumitani, K.; Kiso, Y.; Zembayashi, M.; Fujioka, A.; Kodama, S.; Nakajima, I.; Minato, A.; Kumada, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1976, 49, 1958-1969.
28. (c) Kohara, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1980, 192, 265-274.
29. 11. Van Hecke, G. R.; Horrocks, W. D. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1968-1974.
30. 3 (1:5) catalytic system exhibited similar solvent effect: A typical reaction (see Fig. 9 for reaction conditions) was completed within 1 min in acetonitrile vs 20 min in toluene.
31. 13. Reichardt, C. Lösungsmittel-Effekte in der Organischen Chemie; Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1969.
32. 14. The hypothesis of the oxidative addition as the r.d.s. could not account for the experimental observations since the influence of a salt on this elementary step is rationalized by an acidic assistance, i.e. the acetate salt should lead to higher activities than the phenate did; (formula presented)
33. 15. Taube, R.; Gehrke, J.-P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 327, 419-427.
34. 3] suggest that the oxidative addition is the r.d.s, although we have no explanation for such a peculiar behaviour of iodide and nitrate anions.
35. 17. It is assumed that the presence of two susbtituents on the C=C allylic bound in 4d vs only one in 4e is counterbalanced by the Z stereochemistry in 4d compared to (E)-4e.
36. 18. Whichever the starting substrate (4c or 4e), the E/Z ratio in 6 started from 85/15 in the first stage of the reaction to stabilize after a few minutes at 78/22, i.e. the thermodynamic ratio.
37. 19. Åkermark, B.; Vitagliano, A. Organometallics 1985, 4, 1275-1283.
38. 20. Bricout, H.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Mortreux, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997, 1393-1394.