Fouling of membranes during microfiltration of surimi wash water: Roles of pore blocking and surface cake formation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 144, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 113-123

  Huang, Lihan ^a   Morrissey, Michael T ^a  

^a Oregon Stt Univ Seafood Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Cake formation; Fouling; Pore blocking; Surimi; Wash water

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION EFFECTS; FOULING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; POLYSULFONES; POROUS MATERIALS; PROTEINS;

CAKE FORMATION; MICROFILTRATION; WASH WATER;

WATER FILTRATION;

MUSCLE PROTEIN; POLYSULFONE; PROTEIN; WATER;

FILTER CAKE; FOULING; MEMBRANE; MICROFILTRATION; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; FOOD INDUSTRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEMBRANE FILTER; MICROFILTRATION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032503492     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00038-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lee C.M. Surimi process technology. Food Tech. 38:1984;69-80.
2. K. Toyoda, I. Kimura, T. Fujita, S.F. Nogochi, C.M. Lee, The surimi manufacturing process, in: T.C. Lanier, C.M. Lee (Eds.), Surimi Technology, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992, pp. 79-121.
3. Pacheco-Aguilar R., Crawford D.L., Lampila L.E. Procedures for the efficient washing of minced whiting (Merluccius products) flesh for surimi production. J. Food Sci. 54:1989;248-252.
4. H.-D. Belitz, W. Grosch, Food Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, 1987, p. 461.
5. Lin T.M., Park J.W., Morrissey M.T. Recovered protein and reconditioned water from surimi processing waste. J. Food Sci. 60:1994;4-9.
6. H.M. Johnson, Annual report on the United States Seafood Industry, H.M. Johnson & Associates, 1996.
7. P. Jaouen, M. Bothorel, F. Quemeneur, Recovery of soluble proteins by membrane separation processes: Performance and membrane cleaning, Sixth International Symposium on Synthetic Membranes in Science and Technology, Thubingen, Germany, 4-8 September 1989.
8. P. Jaouen, F. Quemeneur, Membrane filtration for waste-water protein recovery, in: M. Le Maguer, P. Jelen (Eds.), Food Engineering and Process Applications, vol. 2, Unit Operations, Elsevier, London, 1986, pp. 213-248.
9. A. Watanabe, T. Ohtani, H. Horikita, H. Ohya, S. Kimura, Recovery of soluble protein from fish jelly processing with self-rejection dynamic membrane, in: M. Le Maguer, P. Jelen (Eds.), Food Engineering and Process Applications, vol. 2, Unit Operations, Elsevier, London, 1986, pp. 213-248.
10. Almas K.A. Application of crossflow membrane technology in the fishing industry. Desalination. 53:1985;167-180.
11. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96:1994;1-58.
12. Marshall A.D., Munro P.A., Tragardh G. The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: A review. J. Membr. Sci. 91:1993;65-108.
13. Blanpain P., Hermia J., Lenoel M. Mechanisms governing permeate flux and protein rejection in the microfiltration of beer with a Cyclopore membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 84:1993;37-51.
14. Bowen W.R., Hall N.J. Properties of microfiltration membranes: Mechanisms of flux loss in the recovery of an enzyme. Biotech. Bioeng. 46:1995;28-35.
15. Bowen W.R., Gan Q. Properties of microfiltration membranes: The effects of adsorption and shear on the recovery of an enzyme. Biotech. Bioeng. 40:1992;491-497.
16. Bowen W.R., Gan Q. Properties of microfiltration membranes: Flux loss during constant pressure permeation of bovine serum albumin. Biotech. Bioeng. 38:1991;688-696.
17. Kawakatsu T., Nakao S., Kimura S. Effects of size and compressibility of suspended particles and surface pore size of membrane on flux in crossflow filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 81:1993;173-190.
18. H.S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992, p. 193.
19. Suki A., Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D. Flux decline in protein ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 21:1984;269-283.
20. Nakao S., Wijmans J.G., smolders C.A. Resistance to the permeate flux in unstirred ultrafiltration filtration of dissolved macromolecular solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 26:1986;165-178.
21. Iritani E., Hayashi T., Murase T. Analysis of filtration mechanism of crossflow upward and downward ultrafiltration. J. Chem. Eng. Japan. 24:1991;39-44.
22. Murase T., Ohn T., Kimata K. Filtrate flux in crossflow microfiltration of dilute suspension forming a highly compressible fouling cake-layer. J. Membr. Sci. 108:1995;121-128.
23. Tanaka T., Kamimura R., Itoh K., Nakanishi K. Factors affecting the performance of crossflow filtration of yeast cell suspension. Biotech. Bioeng. 41:1993;617-624.
24. Redkar S.G., Davis R.H. Crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions in tubular filters. Biotechnol. Prog. 9:1993;625-634.