Do chimeric sponges have improved chances of survival?

Marine Ecology Progress Series

Volumn 164, Issue , 1998, Pages 301-306

  Maldonado, Manuel ^a  

^a CENTRE D ESTUDIS AVANÇATS DE BLANES CEAB CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chimerism; Demosponges; Larval fusion; Recruitment; Sponge larvae

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032499058     PISSN: 01718630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/meps164301     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ayling AL (1980) Patterns of sexuality, asexual reproduction and recruitment in some subtidal marine Demospongiae. Biol Bull Mar Biol Lab Woods Hole 158:271-282
2. Bergquist PR (1978) Sponges. University of California Press, Berkeley
3. Buss LW (1982) Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 5337-5341
4. Buss LW (1990) Competition within and between encrusting clonal invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 5:352-356
5. Cooper EL (1976) Comparative immunology. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
6. Cox DR (1964) Some applications of exponential ordered scores. J R Stat Soc 26:103-110
7. Feldgarden M, Yund PO (1992) Allorecognition in colonial marine invertebrates: does selection favor fusion with kin or fusion with self? Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 182:155-158
8. Fell PE (1974) Porifera. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS (eds) Acoelomate and pseudocoelomate metazoans. Academic Press, New York, p 51-132
9. Gehan EA, Thomas DG (1969) The performance of some two sample tests in small samples with and without censoring. Biometrika 56:127-132
10. Grosberg RK (1988a) The evolution of allorecognition specificity in clonal invertebrates. Q Rev Biol 63:377-412
11. Grosberg RK (1988b) Life history variation within a population of the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri: I. The genetic and environmental control of seasonal variation. Evolution 42:900-920
12. Grosberg RK, Quinn JF (1986) The genetic control and consequences of kin recognition by the larvae of a colonial marine invertebrate. Nature 322:456-459
13. Hidaka M (1985) Tissue compatibility between colonies and newly settled larvae of Pocillopora damicornis. Coral Reefs 4:111-116
14. Ilan M, Loya Y (1990) Ontogenetic variation in sponge histocompatibility responses. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 179:279-286
15. Jaeckle WB (1995) Transport and metabolism of alanine and palmitic acid by field-collected larvae of Tedania ignis (Porifera, Demospongiae): estimated consequences of limited label translocation. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 189:159-167
16. Lee ET (1980) Statistical methods for survival data analysis. Lifetime Learning, Belmont, CA
17. Maldonado M, Young CM (1996) Effects of physical factors on larval behavior, settlement and recruitment of four tropical demosponges. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 138:169-180
18. Manly BFJ (1991) Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London
19. Pancer Z, Gershon H, Rinkevich B (1995) Coexistence and possible parasitism of somatic and germ cell lines in chimeras of the colonial urochordate Botryllus schlosseri. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 189:106-112
20. Rinkevich B, Weissman IL (1987a) Chimeras in colonial invertebrates: a synergistic symbiosis or somatic-and germ-cell parasitism? Symbiosis 4:117-134
21. Rinkevich B, Weissman IL (1987b) A long-term study on fused subclones in the ascidian Botryllus schlosseri: the resorption phenomenon (Protochordata: Tunicata). J Zool Lond 213:717-733
22. Rinkevich B, Weissman IL (1987c) The fate of Botryllus larvae cosettled with parental colonies: beneficial or deleterious consequences. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 173:474-488
23. Rinkevich B, Weissman IL (1989) Variation in the outcomes following chimera formation in the colonial tunicate Botryllus schlosseri. Bull Mar Sci 45:213-227
24. Rinkevich B, Weissman IL (1992) Chimeras vs genetically homogeneous individuals: potential fitness costs and benefits. Oikos 63:119-124
25. Shenk MA, Buss LW (1991) Ontogenetic changes in fusibility in the colonial hydroid Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. J Exp Zool 257:456-459
26. Stoddart JA (1983) Asexual production of planulae in the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 76:279-284
27. Tuomi J, Vuorisalo T (1989) Hierarchical selection in modular organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 4:209-213
28. Turon X, Becerro MA (1992) Growth and survival of several ascidian species from the northwestern Mediterranean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 82:235-247
29. Turon X, Tarjuelo I, Uriz MJ (1998) Growth dynamics and mortality of the encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Poecilosclerida) in contrasting habitats: correlation with population J structure and investment in defence. Funct Ecol (in press)
30. Uriz MJ (1982) Reproducción en Hymeniacidon sanguinea (Grant, 1826): biología de la larva y primeros estadios postlarvarios. Invest Pesq 46(1):29-39
31. Van de Vyver G (1988) Histocompatibility responses in freshwater sponges: a model for studies of cell-cell interactions in natural populations and experimental systems. In: Grosberg RK, Hedgecock D, Nelson RK (eds) Invertebrate historecognition. Plenum Press, New York, p 1-14
32. Van Duyl FC, Bak RPM, Sybesma J (1981) The ecology of the tropical compound ascidian Trididemmun solidum. I. Reproductive strategy and larval behaviour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 6:35-42
33. Warburton FE (1958) Reproduction of fused larvae in tne boring sponges Cliona celata. Nature 181:493-494
34. Wilson H van P (1907) On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J Exp Zool 5:245-258
35. Wulff JL (1986) Variation in clone structure of fragmenting coral reef sponges. Biol J Linn Soc 27:311-330
36. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
37. Zea S (1987) Esponjas del Caribe colombiano. Editorial Catálogo Científico, Santa Marta