Quality of reports of randomised trials and estimates of treatment efficacy (multiple letters) [12]

Lancet

Volumn 352, Issue 9139, 1998, Pages 1555-1556

  Sauerland, S ^a   Lefering, R ^a   Moher, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; LETTER; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0032494723     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60370-4     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. SN Goodman J Berlin SW Fletcher RH Fletcher Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine Ann Intern Med 121 1994 11 21
2. JPEN Pieric HC Walvoort AJPM Overbeke Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde Lancet 348 1996 1480 1483
3. BJ Sweitzer DJ Cullen How well does a journal's peer review process function? a survey of authors' opinions JAMA 272 1994 152 153