A national bill of patients' rights

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 338, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 695-699

  Annas, George J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIRST AID; HUMAN RIGHTS; ILLNESS BEHAVIOR; INFORMED CONSENT; LAW; MANAGED CARE; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; REVIEW;

ACCOUNTABILITY; ADVISORY COMMISSION ON CONSUMER PROTECTION AND QUALITY IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; AUTONOMY; CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; EMERGENCY CARE; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HISTORICAL ASPECTS; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL RIGHTS; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; UNITED STATES;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CONFIDENTIALITY; DISCLOSURE; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT RIGHTS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TREATMENT REFUSAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032485237     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199803053381020     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. The prepared text of President Clinton's State of the Union message. New York Times. January 28, 1998:A19.
2. Starr P. The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982:388-93.
3. Annas GJ, The rights of hospital patients. New York: Avon, 1975.
4. Cobbs v. Grant, 8 Cal. 3d 229, 502 P.2d 1 (1972).
5. Annas GJ. The rights of patients. 2nd ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989.
6. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
7. Annas GJ, Glantz, LH, Mariner WK. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. JAMA 1990;263:858-61.
8. Annas GJ. The health care proxy and the living will. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1210-3.
9. Millensone ML. Demanding medical excellence; doctors and accountability in the information age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997
10. Rodwin MA. Medicine, money, and morals: physicians' conflicts of interest. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
11. Annas GJ. Women and children first. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1647-51.
12. A new look: how managed care is trying to improve its battered image. Modern Healthcare. May 12, 1997:36-46.
13. Kassirer JP. Managing managed care's tarnished image. N Engl J Med 1997;337:338-9.
14. Pear R. Three big health plans urge national standards. New York Times. September 25, 1997:A1.
15. Idem. Panel of experts urges broadening of patient rights. New York Times. October 23, 1997:A1.
16. Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry. Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities: report to the President of the United States, November 1997.
17. Annas GJ. Patients' rights in managed care - exit, voice, and choice. N Engl J Med 1997;337:210-5.
18. Annas GJ, Healey J. The patient rights advocate: redefining the doctor-patient relationship in the hospital setting. Vanderbilt Law Rev 1974;27:243-69.
19. Furrow BR. Managed care organizations and patient injury: rethinking liability. Georgia Law Rev 1997;31:419-509.
20. Mariner WK. Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field. Am J Public Health 1996;86:863-9.