Release kinetics studies of aromatic molecules into water from block polymer micelles

Macromolecules

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 3578-3587

  Teng, Yue ^a   Morrison, M E ^a,c   Munk, P ^a   Webber, S E ^a   Procházka, Karel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c IBM ALMADEN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOCK COPOLYMERS; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; FLUORESCENCE; LATEXES; MACROMOLECULES; POLYACRYLATES; POLYETHYLENE OXIDES; POLYSTYRENES; PROBES; REACTION KINETICS; SOLUBILITY; VINYL RESINS;

HYDROPHOBICITY; PARTITION COEFFICIENTS; PHENANTHRENE; POLYBUTYL ACRYLATE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID; POLYVINYLPYRIDINE; PYRENE;

MICELLES;

EID: 0032474323     PISSN: 00249297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ma971721u     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. (a) Tuzar, Z.; Kratochvil, P. In Surface and Colloid Science; Matijevic, E. Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, 1993: Vol. 15, p 1.
2. (b) Riess, G.; Hurtrez, G.; Bahadur, P. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd ed.; Mark, H. F., Bikales, N. M., Overberger, C. G., Menges, G., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1985; Vol. 2, pp 324-436.
3. (c) Solvents and Self-Organization of Polymers; Webber, S. E., Munk, P., Tuzar, Z., Eds.; NATO ASI Series E 327, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.
4. (a) Nagarajan, R. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 1, 391.
5. (b) Tian, M.; Area, C.; Tuzar, Z.; Webber, S. E.; Munk, P. J. Polym. Sci., B: Polym. Phys. 1995, 33, 1713. Hurter, P. N.; Alexandridis, P.; Hatton, T. A. In Solubilization in Surfactant Aggregates; Christian, S. D., Scamehorn, J. F., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1995; pp 191-235.
6. (b) Tian, M.; Area, C.; Tuzar, Z.; Webber, S. E.; Munk, P. J. Polym. Sci., B: Polym. Phys. 1995, 33, 1713. Hurter, P. N.; Alexandridis, P.; Hatton, T. A. In Solubilization in Surfactant Aggregates; Christian, S. D., Scamehorn, J. F., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1995; pp 191-235.
7. (c) Gadell, F.; Koros, W. J.; Schechter, R. S. Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 4883.
8. (d) Kabanov, A. V.; Nazarova, I. R., Astafieva, I. V.; Batrakova, E. V.; Alakhov, V. A. Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 2303.
9. (e) Haulbrook, W. R.; Feerer, J. L.; Hatton, T. A.; Tester, J. W. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 2783.
10. (a) Harada, A.; Kataoka, K. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1995, 16, 295.
11. (b) Harada, A.; Kataoka, K. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 5294.
12. (c) Scholz, C.; Iijima, M.; Nagasaki, Y.; Kataoka, K. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 7295.
13. (d) Bader, J. H.; Rin, H.; Schmidt, B. Angew. Makromol. Chem. 1984, 123, 457.
14. (a) Karymov, M. A.; Procházka, K.; Mendenhall, J. M.; Martin, T. J.; Munk, P.; Webber, S. E. Langmuir 1996, 12, 4748.
15. (b) Martin, T. J.; Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8845.
16. (c) Qin, A.; Tian, M.; Ramireddy, C.; Webber, S. E.; Munk, P.; Tuzar, Z. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 120.
17. (d) Chan, J.; Fox, S.; Kiserow, D. J.; Ramireddy, C.; Munk, P.; Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 7016.
18. (e) Tian, M.; Qin, A.; Ramireddy, C.; Webber, W. E.; Munk, P.; Tuzar, Z.; Procházka, K. Langmuir 1993, 9, 1741.
19. (f) Prochâzka, K.; Kiserow, D.; Ramireddy, C.; Tuzar, Z.; Munk, P., Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1992, 25, 454.
20. (g) Kiserow, D.: Procházka, K.; Ramireddy, C.; Tuzar, Z.; Munk, P., Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1992, 25, 461.
21. (h) Cao. T.; Munk, P.; Ramireddy, C.; Tuzar, Z.; Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 6300.
22. Martin, T. J.; Procházka, K.; Munk, P.; Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6071.
23. Procházka, K.; Martin, T. J.; Munk, P.; Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1996, 29: (a) 6526; (b) 6518.
24. Procházka, K.; Martin, T. J.; Munk, P.; Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1996, 29: (a) 6526; (b) 6518.
25. Procházka, K.; Martin, T. J.; Munk, P.; Webber, S. E. Macromolecules 1996, 29: (a) 6526; (b) 6518.
26. Area, E.; Tian, M.; Webber, S. E.; Munk, P. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 1995, 2, 31.
27. (a) Stepánek, M.; Krijtová, K.; Procházka, K.; Teng, Y.; Webber, S. E.; Munk, P. Acta Polym. 1998, 49, 96.
28. (b) Stepánek, M.; Krijtová, K.; Limpouchová, Z.; Procházka, K.; Teng, Y.; Webber, S. E.; Munk, P. Acta Polym. 1998, 49, 103.
29. Wang, Y.; Kausch, C. M.; Chun, M. Quirk, R. P.; Mattice, W. L. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 904.
30. Smith, C. K.; Liu, G. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 2060.
31. Rager, T.; Meyer, W. H.; Wegner, G.; Winnik, M. A. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 4911.
32. (a) Creutz, S.; van Stam, J.; De Schryver, F. C.; Jérôme, R. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 681.
33. (b) Creutz, S.; van Stam, J.; Antoun, S.; De Schryver, F. C.; Jérôme, R. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 4078.
34. Reviews include (a) Kalyanasundaram, K. Photochemistry in Microheterogeneous Systems; Academic Press: Orlando, FL 1987. (b) Zana, R. Ed. Surfactant Solutions; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1987.
35. Reviews include (a) Kalyanasundaram, K. Photochemistry in Microheterogeneous Systems; Academic Press: Orlando, FL 1987. (b) Zana, R. Ed. Surfactant Solutions; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1987.
36. Hruska, Z.; Piton, M.; Yekta, A.; Duhamel, J.; Winnik, M. A. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 1825.
37. Martin, T. J. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, May, 1996. These micelles are similar to those studied in ref 8.
38. Private communication.
39. -2 M, respectively), no precipitation was observed.
40. In ref 8 an alternative fluorescence method obtained a partition coefficient of pyrene in similar PS-PMA micelles approximately twice that obtained in this study.
41. Yalkowsky, S. H.; Banerjee, S. Aqueous Solubility; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1992. See Table 4.2.
42. Pearlman, R. S.; Yalkowsky, S. H.; Banerjee, S. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1984, 13, 555.
43. buffer = 3.7 ± 0.4 mM, both of which are slightly different than the values in Table 1. These differences illustrate the accuracy of our method when applied to very dilute solutions.
44. Nakashima, K.; Winnik, M. A.; Dai, K. H.; Kramer, E. J.; Washiyama, J. Macromolecules 1992, 25, 6866.
45. Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Plenum Press: New York, 1983.
46. Lyatskaya et al. have argued that the deprotonation in micelles of this class will be a strong function of distance from the core/corona interface at low ionic strength (Lyatskaya, Y. V.; Leermakers, F. A. M.; Fleer, G. J.; Zhulina, E. B.; Birshtein, T. M. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 3562).
47. Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion; Oxford University Press: New York, 1957. See section 6.33.25.
48. See Table 6.1 of ref 25.
49. Morrison, M. E. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, May 1997.
50. This is also found in the independent experiments reported in ref 8.
51. buffer-(0).
52. Clements, J. Research in progress.
53. Kalyanasundaram, K.; Thomas, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 99, 22039.
54. Dong, D. C.; Winnik, M. A. Photochem. Photobiol. 1982, 35, 17.
55. 2} from ref 25, eq 6.20, where M(t) corresponds to the total amount of probe inside the sphere.
56. Of course pyrene and phenathrene are not what one would normally think of as good solvents. Undoubtedly very significant plasticization would be observed with species such as benzene.
57. -6 M, or 3.69 nmol in the 3 mL total volume.
58. Berens, A. R.; Hopfenberg, H. B. J. Membrane Sci. 1982, 10, 283. These authors find the best exponential correlation when using the molecular diameters for molecules that are roughly spherical.
59. Krevelen, D. W. Properties of Polymers: Their Correlation with Chemical Structure: Their Numerical Estimation and Prediction from Additive Group Contributions; Elsevier: Amsterdam, New York, 1990.
60. 2/s.
61. Bergbreiter, D. E.; Gray, H. N.; Srinivas, B. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 7294 and references to earlier work therein.
62. A similar conclusion was reached for micelles with a fluorescence probe at the interface between the core and the corona (Eckert, A. R.; Martin, T. J.; Webber, S. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 1646).
63. Shusharina, N. P.; Nyrkova, I. A.; Khokhlov, A. R. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 3167.
64. 2/s. The micelle loading procedure for the present studies was different from that for the earlier work, but it is not clear why this would affect the diffusion constant.