Position and spatial orientation of magnetic bodies from archaeological magnetic surveys

Annali di Geofisica

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 343-358

  Piro, Salvatore ^a   Samir, Ahmed ^b   Versino, Lucio ^a  

^a Istituto Per Le Tecnologie Applicate Ai Beni Culturali Montelibretti   (Italy)

^b Zagazig University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Applied geophysics; Archaeological prospection; Cross correlation technique; Magnetic method; Synthetic models

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIC METHOD; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY;

EID: 0032470144     PISSN: 03652556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. AITKEN, M.J. (1974): Physics and Archaeology (Claredon Press, Oxford), pp. 286.
2. BATH, M. (1974): Spectral analysis in geophysics, in Developments in Solid Earth Geophysics (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company).
3. BECKER, H. (1995). From nanotesla to picotesla. A new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology, Archaeological Prospection, 2, 217-228.
4. BERNABINI, M., E. BRIZZOLARI and S. PIRO (1988): Improvement of signal to noise ratio in resistivity profiles, Geophys. Prospect., 36, 559-570.
5. BHATTACHARYYA, B.K. (1965): Two dimensional harmonic analysis as a tool for magnetic interpretation, Geophysics, 30, 829-857.
6. TALWANI, M. (1965): Computation with the help of a digital computer of magnetic anomalies caused by bodies of arbitrary shape, Geophysics, 30 (5), 797-817.
7. TREITEL, S. and E.A. ROBINSON (1969): Optimum digital filters for signal to noise ratio enhancement, Geophys. Prospect., 17, 248-293.
8. TSOKAS, G.N. and O.R. HANSEN (1995): A comparison of inverse filtering and multiple source Werner deconvolution for model archaeological problems, Archaeometry, 37, 185-193.
9. WEYMOUTH, J.W. (1986): Geophysical methods of archaeological site surveying, Adv. Archaeol. Method Theory, 9, 311-395.