Dichotic speech tests

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 27, Issue 49, 1998, Pages 35-39

  Hällgren, Mathias ^a,b   Johansson, Magnus ^a   Larsby, Birgitta ^a   Arlinger, Stig ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Central auditory dysfunction; Central auditory processing; Dichotic listening; Dichotic listening test

Indexed keywords

ORGANIC SOLVENT; SOLVENT;

ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; DYSLEXIA; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOWEL; WRITING; ARTICLE; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CHILD; DANGEROUS GOODS; FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY DISEASES, CENTRAL; CHILD; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FEMALE; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SOLVENTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032468382     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Berlin C, McNeil M. Dichotic listening. In: Lass N. ed. Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
2. Ekberg K, Hane M, Berggren T. Psychological effects of exposure to solvents and other neurotoxic agents in the work environment. In: Zenz C, et al. Occupational medicine, 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1994; 779-89.
3. Galaburda N, Kemper T. Cytoarchitectonic abnormalities in developmental dyslexia: a case study. Ann Neurol 1979; 6: 94-100.
4. Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 79-87.
5. Hugdahl K, Asbjörnsen A. Dichotic listening with CV-syllables - manual (in Norwegian). Dept of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, 1990.
6. Hugdahl K, Heiervang E, Nordby H, Smievoll AI. Central auditory processing and brain lateratity: applications to dyslexia. Scand Audiol 1998; 27 Suppl 49: this issue.
7. ISO 7029. Acoustics-threshold of hearing by air conduction as function of age and sex for otologically normal persons. Geneva; International Organization for Standardization. 1984.
8. Jerger J, Chmiel R, Allen J, Wilson A. Effects of age and gender on dachotic sentence identification. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 274-86.
9. Kimura D. Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol 1961; 15. 156-65.
10. Musiek FE, Kurdziel-Schwan S, Kibbe KS, Gollegly KM, Baran JA, Rintelmann WF. The dichotic rhyme task: results in splitbrain patients. Ear Hear 1989; 1: 33-9.
11. Musiek FE, Lamb L. Central auditory assessment an overview. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology, 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994: 197-211.
12. Müller HG, Beck WG, Sedge RK. Comparison of the efficiency of cortical level speech tests. Semin Hear 1987; 8: 279-98.
13. Noffsinger D, Martinez CD, Wilson RH. Dichotic listening to speech: background and preliminary data for digits, sentences, and nonsense syllables. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 248-54
14. Obrzut JE. Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities. San Diego: American Press 1991; 179-98.
15. Ödkvist LM, Arlinger SD, Edling C, Larsby B, Bergholtz LM. Audioiogical and vestibulo-oculomotor findings in workers exposed to solvents and jet fuel. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 75-81.
16. Orton ST. Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: Norton, 1937.
17. Wilson RH, Jaffe MS. Interactions of age, ear, and stimulus complexity on dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 358-64.