The influence of spawning habitat on natural reproduction of muskellunge in wisconsin

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 127, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 995-1005

  Zorn, Sarah A ^a   Margenau, Terry L ^b   Diana, James S ^a   Edwards, Clayton J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^c NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EGG DEVELOPMENT; FISH; HABITAT STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SPAWNING GROUND; SURVIVAL;

UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

ESOX MASQUINONGY;

EID: 0032465080     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127<0995:TIOSHO>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, R. O. 1959. A modified flotation technique for sorting bottom fauna samples. Limnology and Oceanography 4:223-225.
2. Axon, J. R., and L. E. Kornman. 1986. Characteristics of native muskellunge streams in eastern Kentucky. Pages 263-272inHall (1986).
3. Bean, T. H. 1908. The muskalonge [sic] of the Ohio basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 37:145-151.
4. Born, S. M., T. L. Wirth, E. M. Brick, and J. O. Peterson. 1973. Restoring the recreational potential of small impoundments. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Technical Bulletin 71, Madison.
5. Carbine, W. F. 1944. Egg production of the northern pikeEsox luciusL., and the percentage survival of eggs and young on the spawning grounds. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 29:123-137.
6. Clapsadl, M. D. 1993. An examination of habitat characteristics influencing the survival of stocked muskellunge, Esox masquinongy, in four St. Lawrence river embayments. Master’s thesis. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse.
7. Crossman, E. J. 1978. Taxonomy and distribution of North American Esocids. Pages 13-26inR. L. Kendall, editor. Selected coolwater fishes of North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 11, Bethesda, Maryland.
8. Dahlberg, M. D. 1979. A review of survival rates for fish eggs and larvae in relation to impact assessments. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Marine Fisheries Review 41(3):1-12.
9. Dombeck, M. P. 1979. Movement and behavior of the muskellunge determined by radio telemetry. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Technical Bulletin 113, Madison.
10. Dombeck, M. P 1986. Muskellunge habitat with guidelines for habitat management. Pages 208-215inHall (1986).
11. Dombeck, M. P, B. W. Menzel, and P N. Hinz. 1984. Muskellunge spawning habitat and reproductive success. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:205-216.
12. Dombeck, M. P, B. W. Menzel, and P N. Hinz. 1986. Natural muskellunge reproduction in Midwestern lakes. Pages 122-134inHall (1986).
13. Dunst, R. C., and nine coauthors. 1974. Survey of lake rehabilitation techniques and experiences. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Technical Bulletin 75, Madison.
14. Eddy, S., and J. C. Underhill. 1974. Northern fishes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
15. Galat, D. L. 1973. Normal embryonic development of the muskellunge(Esox masquinongy).Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 102:384-391.
16. Gee, G. W., and J. W. Bauder. 1986. Particle-size analysis. Pages 283-311inA. Klute, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1, 2nd edition. Number 9. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.
17. Hall, G. E., editor. 1986. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
18. Hanson, D. A. 1986. Population characteristics and angler use of muskellunge in nine northern Wisconsin lakes. Pages 238-248inHall (1986).
19. Hanson, D. A., and five coauthors. 1986. Improving musky management: a review of management and research needs. Pages 335-341inHall (1986).
20. Harrison, E. J., and W. F. Hadley. 1978. Ecologic separation of sympatric muskellunge and northern pike. Pages 129-134inR. L. Kendall, editor. Selected coolwater fishes of North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 11, Bethesda, Maryland.
21. Hassan, K. C., and J. R. Spotila. 1976. The effect of acclimation on the temperature tolerance of young muskellunge fry. Pages 136-140inG. W. Esch and R. W. McFarlane, editors. Thermal ecology II: proceedings of a symposium held at Augusta, Georgia, April 2-5, 1975. Energy Research and DevelopmentAdministration, Technical Information Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
22. Hess, L., and C. Hartwell. 1978. Literature review of large esocids (muskellunge, northern pike and hybrid tiger muskellunge). Pages 139-175inJ. Dube and Y. Gravel, editors. Proceedings of the 10th warmwater workshop. American Fisheries Society, Northeastern Division, Bethesda, Maryland.
23. Hjort, J. 1914. Fluctuation in the great fisheries of northern Europe viewed in the light of biological research. Rapports et Proces-Verbaux des Reunions Conceil International pour L’ Exploration de la Mer 20:1-228.
24. Inskip, P. D. 1986. Negative associations between abundances of muskellunge and northern pike: evidence and possible explanations. Pages 135-150inHall (1986).
25. Johnson, L. D. 1958. Pond culture of muskellunge in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Conservation Department, Technical Bulletin 17, Madison.
26. Johnson, L. D. 1981. Comparison of muskellunge populations in a stocked lake and unstocked lake in Wisconsin, with notes on the occurrence of northern pike. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Research Report 110, Madison.
27. Kadlec, J. A. 1962. The effects of drawdown on a waterfowl impoundment. Ecology 43:267-281.
28. Klingbiel, J. H., and A. A. Oehmcke. 1957. A closed circuit battery for the incubation and hatching of muskellunge and sucker eggs. Wisconsin Conservation Department, Northeast Area Fish Management Division, Investigational Memorandum 1, Rhinelander.
29. Leach, G. C. 1927. Artificial propagation of pike perch, yellow perch and pikes. U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, Document 1018, Washington, D.C.
30. Lebeau, B., and G. Pageau. 1989. Comparative urogenital morphology and external sex determination in muskellunge, EsoxmasquinongyMitchell. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67:1053-1060.
31. Lyons, J., and T. L. Margenau. 1986. Population dynamics of stocked adult muskellunge(Esox masquinongy)in Lac Court Oreilles, Wisconsin 1961-1977. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Technical Bulletin 160, Madison.
32. MacGregor, J., J. Scott, and B. Dean. 1960. A review of the life history and proposed management of the northern muskellunge(Esoxm. immaculatus).Michigan Department of Conservation, Fish Division, Lake and Stream Improvement Report 100, Ann Arbor.
33. Margenau, T L., and S. AveLallemant. 1993. Evaluation of a 40-inch size limit for muskellunge in Wisconsin. Progress Report, Study 629, Spooner, Wisconsin.
34. Nelson, D. W., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Organic carbon and organic matter. Pages 561-579inA. L. Page, editor. Methods of soil analysis, part 2, number 9, 2nd edition. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin.
35. Nevin, J. 1901. The propagation of muskellunge in Wisconsin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 30:90-93.
36. Norusis, M. J. 1993. SPSS. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
37. Oehmcke, A. A., L. Johnson, J. Klingbiel, and C. Wis-trom. 1958. The Wisconsin muskellunge - its life history, ecology and management. Wisconsin Conservation Department, Publication 225, Madison.
38. Peterka, J. J., and J. S. Kent. 1976. Dissolved oxygen, temperature, survival of young at fish spawning sites. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/3-76-113, Washington, D.C.
39. Porter, L. R. 1977. Review of selected literature on muskellunge life history, ecology and management. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Special Publication 119, St. Paul.
40. Schneberger, E. 1936. Spawning habits of the muskellunge. Wisconsin Conservation Department, Unpublished Report, Madison.
41. Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwaterfish-es of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 184.
42. Siefert, R. E., W. A. Spoor, and R. F. Syrett. 1973. Effects of reduced oxygen concentrations on northern pike(Esox lucius)embryos and larvae. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30:849-852.
43. Stoyenoff, J. L., J. A. Witter, and B. A. Leutscher. 1995. Protocol handbook for the Michigan impact monitoring system. Michigan Cooperative Forest Pest Management Program, Handbook 95-1, Lansing.
44. Trautman, M. B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio, revised edition. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.
45. WDNR (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources). 1996. Wisconsin muskellunge waters. WDNR Publication RS-919-96, Madison.
46. Westers, H., and R. R. Stickney. 1993. Northern pike and muskellunge. Pages 199-213inR. R. Stickney, editor. Culture of nonsalmonid freshwater fishes, 2nd edition. CRC Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
47. Wilkinson, L. 1989. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston, Illinois.
48. Zar, J. H. 1974. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
49. Zorn, S. A. 1996. The influence of spawning habitat on natural reproduction of muskellunge in Wisconsin. Master’s thesis. University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment, Ann Arbor.