Outcomes of orthotic and seating interventions on people with disabilities

Current Opinion in Orthopaedics

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 96-99

  Neilson, Aileen ^a   Bardsley, Geoff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b Dundee Limb Fitting Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; KNEE FUNCTION; ORTHOTICS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032464334     PISSN: 10419918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001433-199812000-00017     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. 1. Matsuno H, Kadowaki KM, Tsuji H: Generation II knee bracing for severe medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78:745-749.
2. 2. Abel MF, Juhl GA, Vaughan CL, Damiano DL: Gait assessment of fixed ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic diplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79:126-133.
3. 3. Harvey L, Smith MB, Davis GM, Engel S: Functional outcomes attained by T9-12 paraplegic patients with the walkabout and the isocentric reciprocal gait orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78:706-711.
4. 4. Park BK, Song HR, Vankoski SJ, Moore CA, Dias LS: Gait electromyography in children with myelomeningocele at the sacral level. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78:471-475.
5. 5. Mueller MJ, Strube MJ: Therapeutic footwear: enhanced function in people with diabetes and transmetatarsal amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78:952-956.
6. 6. Nordenskiöld U: Daily activities in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1997, 37:1-72.
7. 7. Emmelot CH, Nielsen HKL, Eisma WH: Shoulder fusion for paralysed upper limb. Clin Orthop 1997, 340:95-101.
8. 8. Kernozek TW, Lewin JE: Seat interface pressures of individuals with paraplegia: influence of dynamic wheelchair locomotion compared with static seated measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79:313-316.
9. 9. Keith CV, Granger BB, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS: The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation. Edited by Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC. New York: Springer; 1987:6-18.
10. 10. Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ: The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1997, 42:236-244.
11. 11. Hoeymans N, Wouters ERCM, Feskens EJM, van den Bos GAM, Kronhout D: Reproducibility of performance-based and self-reported measures of functional status. J Gerontol 1997, 52:M363-M368.
12. 12. Saboe LA, Darrah JM, Pain KS, Guthrie J: Early predictors of functional independence 2 years after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78:644-650.
13. 13. Stineman MG, Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Maislin G: Functional task benchmarks for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79:497-504.
14. 14. Brown K: They are improved, but are they better? [editorial]. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997, 39:213.