Biases in the allocation of Canadian official development assistance

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 773-775

  Arvin, B Mak ^a   Drewes, Torben ^a  

^a TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILATERAL AGREEMENT; DEVELOPMENT AID;

CANADA;

EID: 0032461887     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135048598354005     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bowles, P. (1989) Recipient needs and donor interests in the allocation of EEC aid to developing countries, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 10, 7-19.
2. CIDA (1982-1992) Annual Report, various years, Canadian International Development Agency, Hull, Quebec.
3. Dowling, J.M. and Hiemenz, U. (1985) Biases in the allocation of foreign aid: some new evidence, World Development 13, 535-41.
4. Gounder, R. and Doessel, D.P. (1994) Population and middle-income biases in Australia's bilateral aid: some empirical results, Development Policy Review, 12, 29-44.
5. Heston, A., Summers, R., Nuxoll, D. and Aten, B. (1995) The Penn World Table (Mark 5.6), National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
6. IMF (1982-1992) Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook, various years, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
7. Isenman, P. (1976) Biases in aid allocations against poorer and larger countries, World Development, 4, 631-41.
8. Maizels, A. and Nissanke, M. (1984) Motivations for aid to developing countries, World Development, 12, 879-900.
9. Wall, H.J. (1995) The allocation of official development assistance, Journal of Policy Modeling, 17, 307-14.