Applying the AMMI models to understand genotype-by-environment (G E) interactions in rice reaction to blast disease in Africa

International Journal of Pest Management

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 239-245

  Abamu, F J ^a   Akinsola, E A ^a   Alluri, K ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

G E Ammi; Inger Africa; Rice Blast

Indexed keywords

DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENOTYPE; MODELING; RICE;

ORYZA; PYRICULARIA ORYZAE;

EID: 0032461518     PISSN: 09670874     EISSN: 13665863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096708798228167     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ABAMU, F. J., ALLURI, K., and SESHU, D.V., 1992. Reaction of rice genotypes of different origins and genealogy to blast (BL) disease in Nigeria. International Rice Research Notes (IRRN), 17, 10-11.
2. ALAM, M. S., ALLURI, K., MASAJO, T. M., ZAN, K. and JOHN, V. T., 1986. Upland rice improvement in humid and subhumid tropics ofWest Africa. In Progress in Upland Rice Research (Manila: IRRI), pp. 235-244.
3. BRADU, D. and GABRIEL, K. R., 1978. The biplot as a diagnostic tool for models of two-way tables. Technometrics, 20, 47-68.
4. GAUCH, H. G. Jr, 1992. Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers), pp 278.
5. GAUCH, H. G. Jr, 1993. MATMODEL version 2.0. AMMI and related analyses for two-way data matrices (New York: Soil, Crop, and Atmospheric Sciences).
6. GAUCH, H. G. Jr and FURNAS, R. E., 1991. Statistical analysis of yield trials with MATMODEL. Agronomy Journal, 83, 916-920.
7. GOLLOB, H. F., 1968. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychomelrika, 33, 73- 115.
8. IRRI (International Rice Research Institute), 1988. Standard Evaluation System forRice (Manila: IRRI), pp. 54.
9. JOHN, V. T. and BONMAN J. M., 1986. Recent progress in international research on blast. In Progress in Upland Rice Research (Manila: IRRI), pp. 285-293.
10. KEMPTON, R. A., 1984. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 103, 123-135.
11. MANDEL, J., 1971. A new analysis of variance model for non-additive data. Technometrics, 13, 1-18.
12. OU, S. H., 1985. Rice Diseases, 2nd edition (Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute), pp. 380.
13. SAS, 1995. SAS/STAT User's Guide (North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.).
14. SESHU, D.V., KWAK, T. S. and MACKILL, D. J., 1986. Global evaluation of rice varietal reactions to blast disease. In Progress in Upland Rice Research (Manila: IRRI), pp. 335- 351.
15. ZOBEL, R. W., 1990. A powerful statistical model for understanding genotype-by-environment interaction. In M.S. Kang (ed) Genotype-By-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding (Louisiana: Louisiana State University Agricultural Centre), pp. 126- 140.
16. ZOBEL, R. W., WRIGHT, M. J. and GAUCH, H. G. Jr, 1 988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal, 80, 388-393.