On the relations between hydrography and the ranges of freshwater fish species and subspecies

Italian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 65, Issue , 1998, Pages 87-93

  Banarescu, Petru M ^a  

^a InstitutuI de Biologie   (Romania)

Author keywords

Congeners; Ranges of fishes; River basins; Subspecies

Indexed keywords

FISH; HYDROGRAPHY; RIVER BASIN; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 0032460018     PISSN: 11250003     EISSN: 17485851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11250009809386800     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Banarescu, P., 1953. Variatia geografica, filogenia si ecologia cyprinidului Gobio kessleri. St. cere, st., Cluj, 4:297–337.
2. Banarescu, P., 1961. Weitere systematische Studien über die Gattung Gobio (Pisces, Cyprinidae), insbesonders in Donaubecken. Vestn. cesk. spol. zool., 25:318–346.
3. Banarescu, P., 1969. Cyclostomata et Chondrichthyes, Fauna Romaniei Vol. 12, 104Bucuresti:Ed. Acad. Rom.
4. Banarescu, P., 1995. Biogeographie der oberem Donau am Beispiel der Fische und Neunaugen. Fischöcologie, 8:13–22.
5. Banarescu, P., 1996. On satellite species in ichthyology and on speciation through secundary overlap of geographically and morphologically extreme conspecific subspecies. Evolut. Adapt., (Cluj), 5:121–143.
6. Banarescu, P., Nalbant, T., and Chelmu, S., 1972. Revision and geographical variation of Sabanejewia aurata in Romania and the origin of S. bulgarica and S. romanica. Annot. Zool. Bot. (Bratislava), 75:1–49.
7. Berg, L. S., 1932. Übersicht der Verbreitug der Süßwasserfische Europas. Zoogeographica, 1:107–208.
8. Berg, L. S., 1949. Ryby presnykh vod SSSR I sopredelnykh stran, 2, 3-Izd. Akad. Nauk. Moskva-Leningrad,:469–926. 927–1380.
9. Brylinska, M., ed. 1986. Ryby slokowodne Polski. Wydawn, 429Warszawa:Naukowe.
10. Coburn, M. M., and Gaglione, J. I., 1992. A comparative study of percid scales (Teleostei:Perciformes:Percidae). Copeia,:986–1001. 1992
11. Doadrio, I., Elvira, B., and Bernat, Y., 1991. Peces continentales espanoles, 221Madrid:Coleccion tecnica.
12. Holcik, J., ed. 1986. The freshwater fishes of Europe:Petromyzontiformes, vol. 1, 313Wiesbaden:AULA-Verlag.
13. Holcik, J., and Scorepa, V., 1971. Revision of the Roach, Rutilus nitilus Linnaeus, 1758 with regard of its subspecies. Annot. Zool. Bot. (Bratislava), 64:1–60.
14. Holcik, J., and Duyvene-de-Wit, J. J., 1964. Systematic of the bitterling from Asia Minor and notes on the geographical variation of Rhodeus sericeus (Pallas, 1776) in the area of distribution. Z. wiss. Zool., 169:396–412.
15. Kottelat, M., 1997. European freshwater fishes. Biologia, 53(Sup-pl. 5):1–271.
16. Jayaram, K. C., 1982. The freshwater fishes of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma and Sri Lanka, 476Calcutta:Zool. Surv. India.
17. Lee, D. S., Gilbert, C. R., Hocutt, C. H., Jenkins, R. E., Me Allister, D. E., and Stauffer, J. R., eds. 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, 868Raleigh:North Carolina State. Mus. Nat. Hist.
18. Mayr, E., 1963. Animal species and evolution, 797Harvard University Press.
19. Mirza, M. R., 1990. Pakistan main taza pani ki macchalin (Freshwater fish of Pakistan), 128Lahore:Urdu Science. (in Urdu)
20. Mori, T., 1936. Studies on the geographical distribution of freshwater fishes in eastern Asia 88Tokyo
21. Rensch, B., 1929. Das Pinzip geographischer Rassenkreise und das Problem der Artbildung, 206Berlin:Verl. Gebrud-Borntraeger.