Relative competitive ability changes with competitor density: Evidence from feeding blackbirds

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1367-1373

  Cresswell, Will ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; POPULATION DENSITY;

TURDUS MERULA;

EID: 0032457841     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0902     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bachman, G. 1993. The effect of body condition on the trade-off between vigilance and foraging in Beldings ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 46, 233-244.
2. Caraco, T., Barkan, C. & Beacham, J. L. 1989. Dominance and social foraging: a laboratory study. Animal Behaviour, 38, 41-58.
3. Cresswell, W. 1997. Interference competition at low competitor densities in blackbirds Turdus merula. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 461-471.
4. Cresswell, W. 1998. Variation in the strength of interference competition with resource density in blackbirds, Turdus merula. Oikos, 81, 152-160.
5. Dolman, P. M. 1995. The intensity of interference varies with resource density: evidence from a field-study with snow buntings, Plectrophenax nivalis. Oecologia, 102, 511-514.
6. Elgar, M. A. 1986. The establishment of foraging flocks in house sparrows: risk of predation and daily temperature. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 19, 433-438.
7. Goss-Custard, J. D. 1996. The Oystercatcher: From Individuals to Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Goss-Custard, J. D. & Le V. Dit Durell, S. E. A. 1987. Age-related effects in oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus, feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis. I. Foraging efficiency and interference. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 521-536.
9. Goss-Custard, J. D., Caldow, R. W. G., Clarke, R. T., Le V. Dit Durell, S. E. A. & Sutherland, W. J. 1995. Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. I. Empirical game theory distribution model of oystercatchers Haematopus oestralegus feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 265-276.
10. Grand, T. C. 1997. Foraging site selection by juvenile coho salmon: ideal free distributions of unequal competitors. Animal Behaviour, 53, 185-196.
11. Gray, R. D. 1994. Sparrows, matching and the ideal free distribution: can biological and psychological approaches be synthesized? Animal Behaviour, 48, 411-423.
12. Hassell, M. P. & Varley, G. C. 1969. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature, 223, 1133-1136.
13. Holmgren, N. 1995. The ideal free distribution of unequal competitors: predictions from a behaviour-based functional response. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 197-212.
14. Inman, A. J. 1990. Group foraging in starlings: distributions of unequal competitors. Animal Behaviour, 40, 801-810.
15. Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J. R. & Bernstein, C. 1992. The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 50-55.
16. Korona, R. 1989. Ideal free distribution of unequal competitors can be determined by the form of competition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 138, 347-352.
17. Lima, S. L. 1986. Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions: determinants of body mass in birds. Ecology, 67, 377-385.
18. Milinski, M. & Parker, G. A. 1991. Competition for resources. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (Ed. by J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 137-168. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
19. Milinski, M., Boltshauser, P., Buchi, L., Buchwalder, T., Frischknecht, M., Hadermann, T., Kunzler, R., Roden, C., Ruetschi, A., Strahm, D. & Tognola, M. 1995. Competition for food in swans: an experimental test of the truncated phenotype distribution. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 758-766.
20. Moody, A. L. & Houston, A. I. 1995. Interference and the ideal free distribution. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1065-1072.
21. Norusis, M. J. 1990. SPSS/PC+ Advanced Statistics 4.0. Gorinchem: SPSS.
22. Parker, G. A. & Sutherland, W. J. 1986. Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1222-1242.
23. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. 2nd edn. New York: W. H. Freeman.
24. Spencer, H. G., Kennedy, M. & Gray, R. D. 1995. Patch choice with competitive asymmetries and perceptual limits: the importance of history. Animal Behaviour, 50, 497-508.
25. Stillman, R. A., Goss-Custard, J. D., Clarke, R. T. & Le V. Dit Durell, S. E. A. 1996. Shape of the interference function in a foraging vertebrate. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 813-824.
26. Stillman, R. A., Goss-Custard, J. D. & Caldow, R. W. G. 1997. Modelling interference from basic foraging behaviour. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 692-703.
27. Sutherland, W. J. 1983. Aggregation and the 'ideal free' distribution. Journal of Animal Ecology, 52, 821-828.
28. Sutherland, W. J. & Dolman, P. M. 1994. Combining behaviour and population dynamics with applications for predicting consequences of habitat loss. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 255, 133-138.
29. Sutherland, W. J. & Koene, P. 1982. Field estimates of the strength of interference between oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus. Oecologia, 55, 108-109.
30. Sutherland, W. J. & Parker, G. A. 1985. Distribution of unequal competitors. In: Behavioural Ecology (Ed. by R. M. Sibly & R. H. Smith), pp. 255-273. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
31. Sutherland, W. J. & Parker, G. A. 1992. The relationship between continuous input and interference models of ideal free distributions with unequal competitors. Animal Behaviour, 44, 345-355.
32. Sutherland, W. J., Townsend, C. R. & Pratmore, J. M. 1988. A test of the ideal free distribution with unequal competitors. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 51-53.
33. Svensson, L. 1984. Identification Guide to European Passerines. Tring, U.K.: British Trust for Ornithology.
34. Tregenza, T. 1995. Building on the ideal free distribution. Advances in Ecological Research, 26, 253-307.
35. Tregenza, T., Hack, M. A. & Thompson, D. J. 1996. Relative competitive success of unequal competitors changes with overall density. Oikos, 77, 158-162.