Mathematical formalism and characteristics of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses for drug infusions

Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 385-408

  Krzyzanski, Wojciech ^a   Jusko, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Indirect response models; Infusions; Inhibition; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Stimulation

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; DRUG DISPOSITION; DRUG INFUSION; DRUG MECHANISM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STEADY STATE;

EID: 0032455745     PISSN: 0090466X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021060000789     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. N. L. Dayneka, V. Garg, and W. J. Jusko. Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 21:457-478 (1993).
2. W. J. Jusko and H. C. Ko. Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 56:406-419 (1994).
3. A. Sharma and W. J. Jusko. Characterization of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 24:611-635 (1996).
4. W. Krzyzanski and W. J. Jusko. Mathematical formalism for the properties of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 25:107-123 (1997).
5. L. B. Sheiner, D. R. Stanski, S. Vozeh, R. D. Miller, and J. Ham. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d-turbocurarine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 25:358-371 (1979).
6. J. Gabrielsson and D. Weiner. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications, 2nd ed., Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, Stockholm, 1997.
7. F. W. J. Olver. Asymptotics and Special Functions. Academic Press, New York, 1974.