Electromagnetic response of the mantle to long-period geomagnetic variations over the globe

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 50, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 651-662

  Honkura, Yoshimori ^a   Matsushima, Masaki ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOMAGNETISM; MANTLE;

EID: 0032455550     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/BF03352160     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Achache, J., J. L. Le Mouël, and V. Courtillot, Long-period geomagnetic variations and mantle conductivity: An inversion using Bailey's method, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 65, 579-601, 1981.
2. Banks, R. J., Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 17, 457-487, 1969.
3. Banks, R. J., The overall conductivity distribution of the Earth, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 24, 337-351, 1972.
4. Constable, S., Constraints on mantle electrical conductivity from field and laboratory measurements, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 45, 707-728, 1993.
5. Currie, R. G., The geomagnetic spectrum - 40 days to 5.5 years, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 4579-4598, 1966.
6. Ducruix, J., V. Courtillot, and J. L. Le Mouël, The late 1960's secular variation impulse, the eleven year magnetic variation and the electrical conductivity of the deep mantle, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 61, 73-79, 1980.
7. Malin, S. R. C. and A. M. Işikara, Annual variation of the geomagnetic field, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 47, 445-457, 1976.
8. Malin, S. R. C., D. E. Winch, and A. M. Işikara, Semi-annual variation of the geomagnetic field, Abstracts of the 13th Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, Onuma, Hokkaido, Japan, 1996.
9. McLeod, M. G., Signals and noise in magnetic observatory annual means: Mantle conductivity and jerks, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 17,261-17,290, 1992.
10. McLeod, M. G., Magnetospheric and ionospheric signals in magnetic observatory monthly means: Electrical conductivity of the deep mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 13,577-13,590, 1994.
11. Nakagawa, T. and Y. Oyanagi, Analysis of Experimental Data by Least-Square Methods, 206 pp., Univ. Tokyo Press, 1982 (in Japanese).
12. Roberts, R. G., The long-period electromagnetic response of the Earth, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 78, 547-572, 1984.
13. Schultz, A. and L. C. Larsen, Analysis of zonal field morphology and data quality for a global set of magnetic observatory daily mean values, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 35, 835-846, 1983.
14. Schultz, A. and L. C. Larsen, On the electrical conductivity of the mid-mantle - I. Calculation of equivalent scalar magnetotelluric response functions, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 88, 731-761, 1987.
15. Shankland, T. J., J. Peyronneau, and J.-P. Poirier, Electrical conductivity of the Earth's lower mantle. Nature, 366, 453-455, 1993.
16. Tukey, J. W., Introduction to today's data analysis, in Proceedings of the Conference on Critical Evaluation of Chemical and Physical Structural Information, edited by D. R. Lide, Jr. and M. A. Paul, pp. 3-14, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, 1974.