Archaeomagnetic intensity in Finland and Bulgaria-Problems in the applied techniques or evidence of a non-dipole field?

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth

Volumn 23, Issue 9-10, 1998, Pages 1021-1025

  Pesonen, Lauri J ^a   Leino, M A H ^a  

^a GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATING METHOD; MAGNETIC METHOD; PALEOMAGNETISM; SECULAR VARIATION;

BULGARIA; FINLAND;

EID: 0032455288     PISSN: 00791946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-1946(98)00136-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aitken, M.J., Pesonen, L.J. and Leino, M.A.H., 1991. The Thellier palaeointensity technique: mini samples versus standard size. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43, 325-331.
2. Coe, R. S., 1967. The determination of palaeointensities of the Earth's magnetic field with emphasis on mechanisms which could cause non-ideal behaviour in Thellier's method. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 19, 157-179.
3. Daly, L. and LeGoff, M. , 1996. An updated and homogeneous world secular variation data base. 1. Smoothing of the archaeomagnetic results. Phys. Earth. Plan. Int., 93, 159-190.
4. Evans, M. E. , 1987. New archaeomagnetic evidence for the persistence of the geomagnetic westward drift. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 39, 769-772.
5. Kovacheva, M., 1989. Archaeomagnetic studies as dating tool and some consideration of the archaeomagnetic methodology. In: Archaeometry, Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium, Athens, 1986, 35-44.
6. Kovacheva, M. and Toshkov, A. , 1997. Geomagnetic field variations in Bulgaria as determined from Bulgarian archaeomagnetic data. Surveys in Geophysics, 15, 673-701.
7. Leino, M. A. H. and Pesonen, L. J., 1994. Archaeointensity results from Finland: the last 6400 years. Open File Report Q/19/22.0/1994/1, Laboratory for Palaeomagnetism, Geophysics Department, Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, 25 pp.
8. Liritzis, Y. and Kovacheva, M., 1992. Some evidence for sharp changes in the archaeomagnetic intensity variation during the last 2000 years. Phys. Earth Plan. Inter., 70, 85-89.
9. Liritzis, Y. and Lagios, Y., 1993. A global archaeointensity data base. EOS, Trans. Act. Am. Geoph. Un., 74, 303-306.
10. McElhinny, M. W. and Senanayake, W.E., 1982: Variations in the geomagnetic dipole 1: the Past 50,000 years. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 34, 39-51.
11. Merril, R.T and McElhinny, M. W., 1983. The Earth's magnetic field. Its history, origin and planetary perspective, Academic Press, London, 401pp.
12. Pesonen, L. J., Leino, M.A.H., and Nevanlinna, H., 1993. Archeointensity results from Finland - evidences for a rapid latitude-dependent field excursion at ∼500 AD, In: the 7th Scientific Assembly of Iaga, Buenos Aires, abstract volume, p. 172.
13. Pesonen, L.J., Nevanlinna, H., Leino, M.A.H., and Rynš, J., 1994. The Earth's magnetic field maps of 1990.0. Geophysica 30 28No.1-2), 57-77.
14. Pesonen, L. J., Leino, M.A.H., and Nevanlinna, H. , 1995. Archeointensity results from Finland - evidences for a latitude-dependent non-dipole field at ∼500 AD. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 47, 19-40.
15. Pesonen, L.J. and Leino, M., 1997. Archaeomagnetic intensity from Finland of the last 6400 years -: problems in measuring techniques, dating errors or evidences for the non-dipole fold. In: H. Jungner and M. Lavento (editors), Proceedings of the VII Nordic Conference on the Application of Scientific methods in Archaeology. ISKOS 11, 48-60.
16. Sakai, H. and Hirooka, K., 1986. Archaeointensity determinations from western Japan. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 1323-1329.
17. Thellier, E and Thellier, O., 1959. Sur l'intensite du champ magnetique terrestre dans le passe historique et geologique. Ann. Geophys., 15, 285-376.
18. Walton, D. , 1986. Mineral alterations and its effect on paleointensities. J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 38, 1349-1352.
19. Walton, D., 1987. Improving the accuracy of geomagnetic intensity measurements. Nature, 328, 789-791
20. Yang, S, Shaw, J. and Wei, Q. Y. , 1993. Tracking a non dipole geomagnetic anomaly using new archaeointensity results from north-east China. J. Geophys. Int., 115, 1189-1196.