Development of responsiveness to novel objects in the titi monkey, Callicebus moloch

Primates

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 419-431

  Mayeaux, D J ^a   Mason, William A ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral response; Callicebus moloch; Ontogeny; Primate

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ONTOGENY; PRIMATE;

CALLICEBUS MOLOCH; CYRILLA; MOLOCH; PRIMATES;

EID: 0032454662     PISSN: 00328332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02557566     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ANDREWS, M. W. 1988. Spatial strategies of oriented travel in Callicebus moloch and Saimiri sciureus. Anim. Learn. Behav., 16: 429-435.
2. BARNETT, S. A. 1958. Exploratory behaviour. Brit. J. Psychol., 49: 289-310.
3. BERLYNE, D. E. 1966. Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153: 25-33.
4. BUTLER, R. A. 1960. Acquired drives and the curiosity-investigative motives. In: Principles of Comparative Psychology, WATERS, R. H.; RETHLINGSHAFER, D. A.; CALDWELL, W. E. (eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 144-176.
5. CAINE, N. G. 1986. Behavior during puberty and adolescence. In: Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 2A: Behavior, Conservation, and Ecology, MITCHELL, G.; ERWIN, J. (eds.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 327-361.
6. DENNIS, W. 1955. Early recognition of the manipulative drive in monkeys. Brit. J. Anim. Behav., 3: 71-72.
7. EPPLE, G. 1970. Maintenance, breeding, and development of marmoset monkeys (Callithricidae) in captivity. Folia Primatol., 12: 56-76.
8. FRAGASZY, D. M. 1980a. Comparative studies of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri) and titi monkeys (Callicebus) in travel tasks. Z. Tierpsychol., 54: 1-36.
9. FRAGASZY, D. M. 1980b. Titi and squirrel monkeys in a novel environment. In: Captivity and Behavior: Primates in Breeding Colonies, Laboratories and Zoos, ERWIN, J.; MAPLE, T.; MITCHELL, G. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 172-216.
10. FRAGASZY, D. M.; MASON, W. A. 1978. Response to novelty in Saimiri and Callicebus: influence of social context. Primates, 19: 311-331.
11. FRAGASZY, D. M.; SCHWARZ, S.; SHIMOSAKA, D. 1982. Longitudinal observations of care and development of infant titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch). Amer. J. Primatol., 2: 191-200.
12. GLICKMAN, S. E.; SROGES, R. W. 1966. Curiosity in zoo animals. Behaviour, 26: 151-188.
13. GLICKMAN, S. E.; VAN LAER, E. K. 1964. The development of curiosity within the genus Panthera. Zoologica, 49: 109-114.
14. HENNESSY, M. B.; MENDOZA, S. P.; MASON, W. A.; MOBERG, G. P. 1995. Endocrine sensitivity to novelty in squirrel monkeys and titi monkeys: species differences in characteristic modes of responding to the environment. Physiol. Behav., 57: 331-338.
15. HERSHKOVITZ, P. 1963. A systematic and zoogeographic account of the monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae) of the Amazonas and Orinoco River basins. Mammalia, 21: 1-79.
16. JANTSCHKE, B. 1992. Der springaffe (Callicebus cupreus). Zeitschrift des Kölnerzoo, 35: 155-160.
17. JOUBERT, A.; VAUCLAIR, J. 1986. Reaction to novel objects in a troop of Guinea baboons: approach and manipulation. Behaviour, 96: 92-104.
18. KINZEY, W. 1981. The titi monkey, genus Callicebus. In: Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1, COIMBRA-FILHO, A.; MITTERMEIER, R. (eds.), Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 241-276.
19. MASON, W. A. 1966. Social organization of the South American monkey, Callicebus moloch: a preliminary report. Tulane Stud. Zool., 13: 23-28.
20. MASON, W. A. 1968. Use of space by Callicebus groups. In: Primates: Studies in Adaptation and Variability, JAY, P. C. (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 200-216.
21. MASON, W. A. 1971. Motivational factors in psychosocial development. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, ARNOLD, W. J.; PAGE, M. M. (eds.), Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 35-67.
22. MASON, W. A. 1973. Regulatory functions of arousal in primate psychosocial development. In: Behavioral Regulators of Behavior in Primates, CARPENTER, C. R. (ed.), Bucknell Univ. Press, Lewisburg, pp. 19-33.
23. MASON, W. A.; MAYEAUX, D. J. 1993. Responsiveness of Callicebus and Saimiri to stimulus change. Amer. J. Primatol., 30: 333.
24. MENDOZA, S. P.; MASON, W. A. 1986. Parental division of labour and differentiation of attachments in a monogamous primate (Callicebus moloch). Anim. Behav., 34: 1336-1347.
25. MENZEL, C. R. 1986. An experimental study of territory maintenance in captive titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch). In: Primate Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 2, ELSE, J. G.; LEE, P. C. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, pp. 133-143.
26. MENZEL, C. R. 1993. Coordination and conflict in Callicebus groups. In: Primate Social Conflict, MASON, W. A.; MENDOZA, S. P. (eds.), SUNY Press, Albany, New York, pp. 253-290.
27. MENZEL, E. W. JR. 1964. Patterns of responsiveness in chimpanzees reared through infancy under conditions of environmental restriction. Psychol. Forschung, 27: 337-365.
28. MENZEL, E. W. JR. 1966. Responsiveness to objects in free-ranging Japanese monkeys. Behaviour, 26: 130-149.
29. MENZEL, E. W. JR. 1969. Chimpanzee utilization of space and responsiveness to objects: age differences and comparison with macaques. In: Proceedings from the 2nd International Congress of Primatology, Vol. 1: Behavior, CARPENTER, C. R. (ed.), Karger, Basel, pp. 72-80.
30. MENZEL, E. W. JR.; MENZEL, C. R. 1979. Cognitive, developmental and social aspects of responsiveness to novel objects in a family group of marmosets (Saguinus fuscicollis). Behaviour, 70: 251-279.
31. MERITT, D. A. JR. 1980. Captive reproduction and husbandry of the douroucouli and the titi monkey. Int. Zoo Yrbk., 20: 52-59.
32. MILLAR, S. K.; EVANS, S.; CHAMOVE, A. S. 1988. Older offspring contact novel objects soonest in callitrichid families. Biol. Behav., 13: 82-96.
33. MURPHEY, R. M.; MOURA DUARTE, F. A.; NOVAES, W. C.; TORRES PENEDO, M. C. 1981. Age group differences in bovine investigatory behavior. Devel. Psychobiol., 14: 117-125.
34. ROBINSON, J. 1979. Vocal regulation of use of space by groups of titi monkeys Callicebus moloch. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 5: 1-15.
35. RUSSELL, P. A. 1973. Relationships between exploratory behaviour and fear: a review. Brit. J. Psychol., 64: 417-433.
36. TORIGOE, T. 1987. Object manipulation in a captive troop of Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): a developmental analysis. Primates, 28: 497-506.
37. VISALBERGHI, E. 1988. Responsiveness to objects in two social groups of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Amer. J. Primatol., 15: 349-360.
38. VISALBERGHI, E.; MASON, W. A. 1983. Determinants of problem-solving success in Saimiri and Callicebus. Primates, 24: 385-396.
39. WEEKER, W. I. 1961. An analysis of exploratory and play behavior in animals. In: Functions of Varied Experience, FISKE, D. W.; MADDI, S. R. (eds.), Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois, pp. 175-226.
40. WRIGHT, P. 1984. Biparental care in Aotus trivirgatus and Callicebus moloch. In: Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists, SMALL, M. (ed.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 59-75.